Robotic-assisted surgery has improved the precision and accuracy of surgical movements with subsequent improved outcomes. However, it requires steep Trendelenburg positioning combined with pneumoperitoneum that negatively affects respiratory mechanics and increases the risk of postoperative respiratory complications. This narrative review summarises the state of the art in ventilatory management of these patients in terms of levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), tidal volume, recruitment manoeuvres, and ventilation modes during both urological and gynaecological robotic-assisted surgery. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE; after completing abstract and full-text review, 31 articles were included. Although different levels of PEEP were often evaluated within a protective ventilation strategy, including higher levels of PEEP, lower tidal volume, and recruitment manoeuvres vs a conventional ventilation strategy, we conclude that the best PEEP in terms of lung mechanics, gas exchange, and ventilation distribution has not been defined, but moderate PEEP levels (4-8 cm H2O) could be associated with better outcomes than lower or highest levels. Recruitment manoeuvres improved intraoperative arterial oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume and the distribution of ventilation to dependent (dorsal) lung regions. Pressure-controlled compared with volume-controlled ventilation showed lower peak airway pressures with both higher compliance and higher carbon dioxide clearance. We propose directions to optimise ventilatory management during robotic surgery in light of the current evidence.

Ventilation strategy during urological and gynaecological robotic-assisted surgery: a narrative review / D. Chiumello, S. Coppola, I. Fratti, M. Leone, B. Pastene. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA. - ISSN 0007-0912. - 131:4(2023 Oct), pp. 764-774. [10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.066]

Ventilation strategy during urological and gynaecological robotic-assisted surgery: a narrative review

D. Chiumello
Primo
;
S. Coppola
Secondo
;
I. Fratti;M. Leone;
2023

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has improved the precision and accuracy of surgical movements with subsequent improved outcomes. However, it requires steep Trendelenburg positioning combined with pneumoperitoneum that negatively affects respiratory mechanics and increases the risk of postoperative respiratory complications. This narrative review summarises the state of the art in ventilatory management of these patients in terms of levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), tidal volume, recruitment manoeuvres, and ventilation modes during both urological and gynaecological robotic-assisted surgery. A review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE; after completing abstract and full-text review, 31 articles were included. Although different levels of PEEP were often evaluated within a protective ventilation strategy, including higher levels of PEEP, lower tidal volume, and recruitment manoeuvres vs a conventional ventilation strategy, we conclude that the best PEEP in terms of lung mechanics, gas exchange, and ventilation distribution has not been defined, but moderate PEEP levels (4-8 cm H2O) could be associated with better outcomes than lower or highest levels. Recruitment manoeuvres improved intraoperative arterial oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume and the distribution of ventilation to dependent (dorsal) lung regions. Pressure-controlled compared with volume-controlled ventilation showed lower peak airway pressures with both higher compliance and higher carbon dioxide clearance. We propose directions to optimise ventilatory management during robotic surgery in light of the current evidence.
Trendelenburg position; gynaecological surgery; mechanical ventilation; pneumoperitoneum; respiratory mechanics; robotic surgery; urological surgery
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
ott-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0007091223003744-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1026396
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact