A surprising feature of Brexit has been the united front the EU-27 presented during post-referendum negotiations. This membership crisis arrived when the EU had been facing multiple overlapping political and economic crises revealing deep cleavages both between and within member states. How did negotiations prevent a widening politicisation of European integration? In this article a novel dataset is used, containing national and European newspaper Brexit coverage between 2016 and 2020 to establish how negotiating stances were formed in key EU institutions and five influential member states: Ireland, Spain, France, Germany and Poland. The results indicate that the European Commission could maintain a strong, centralised negotiating position over Brexit because the preferences of these member states were mutually inclusive, their negotiating stances aligned, and each national case was subject to generally low levels of domestic politicisation. As a result, while Brexit shocked the EU, its immediate fallout could be contained even during uncertain times.

Quiet unity: salience, politicisation and togetherness in the EU’s Brexit negotiating position / A. Kyriazi, A. Altiparmakis, J. Ganderson, J. Miro. - In: WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS. - ISSN 0140-2382. - (2023), pp. 1-27. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1080/01402382.2023.2264717]

Quiet unity: salience, politicisation and togetherness in the EU’s Brexit negotiating position

A. Kyriazi
Primo
;
2023

Abstract

A surprising feature of Brexit has been the united front the EU-27 presented during post-referendum negotiations. This membership crisis arrived when the EU had been facing multiple overlapping political and economic crises revealing deep cleavages both between and within member states. How did negotiations prevent a widening politicisation of European integration? In this article a novel dataset is used, containing national and European newspaper Brexit coverage between 2016 and 2020 to establish how negotiating stances were formed in key EU institutions and five influential member states: Ireland, Spain, France, Germany and Poland. The results indicate that the European Commission could maintain a strong, centralised negotiating position over Brexit because the preferences of these member states were mutually inclusive, their negotiating stances aligned, and each national case was subject to generally low levels of domestic politicisation. As a result, while Brexit shocked the EU, its immediate fallout could be contained even during uncertain times.
English
Brexit; European Union; media content analysis; negotiations; politicisation; salience
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
Articolo
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Pubblicazione scientifica
   Policy Crisis and Crisis Politics. Sovereignty, Solidarity and Identity in the EU post 2008 (SOLID)
   SOLID
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   H2020
   810356
2023
26-ott-2023
Routledge Taylor & Francis
1
27
27
Epub ahead of print
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Quiet unity: salience, politicisation and togetherness in the EU’s Brexit negotiating position / A. Kyriazi, A. Altiparmakis, J. Ganderson, J. Miro. - In: WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS. - ISSN 0140-2382. - (2023), pp. 1-27. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1080/01402382.2023.2264717]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
4
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
A. Kyriazi, A. Altiparmakis, J. Ganderson, J. Miro
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Quiet unity salience politicisation and togetherness in the EU s Brexit negotiating position.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: online first
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.7 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.7 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1022449
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact