The article aims to show that a marginal note contained in Laur. pl. 59,15, one of the main manuscripts of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ De Compositione Verborum, contains text by the author himself. The recovered text gives an alternative name for the tribrach, which in the 1st century BC was also called trochaeus. This is the denomination also used by Cicero in the Orator and by Quintilian and provides support for Dionysius’ terminology.
Trochaeus» e χορεῖος : una ‘confusione’ ciceroniana e un marginale dimenticato di Dionigi d’Alicarnasso (Comp. 17,7) / G. Mendicino. - In: EIKASMOS. - ISSN 1121-8819. - 34:(2023), pp. 209-217. [10.19199/2023.XXXIV.1121-8819.209]
Trochaeus» e χορεῖος : una ‘confusione’ ciceroniana e un marginale dimenticato di Dionigi d’Alicarnasso (Comp. 17,7)
G. MendicinoPrimo
2023
Abstract
The article aims to show that a marginal note contained in Laur. pl. 59,15, one of the main manuscripts of Dionysius of Halicarnassus’ De Compositione Verborum, contains text by the author himself. The recovered text gives an alternative name for the tribrach, which in the 1st century BC was also called trochaeus. This is the denomination also used by Cicero in the Orator and by Quintilian and provides support for Dionysius’ terminology.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
EIKASMOS_2023_209_MENDICINO.PDF
Open Access dal 01/01/2026
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.12 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.12 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
