The paper aims at reflecting on the judicial control of the discretionary measures in banking and financial fields exercised by the EU Courts, as well as the ‘quasi-judicial’ control, in the same fields, exercised by the Boards of Appeal. Therefore, the present article firstly discusses the EU Courts’ general approach over discretionary acts, assessing the peculiarities of the cases related to decisions taken by banking authorities. Secondly, the papers assessesthe ‘new’ means of quasi-judicial accountability, i.e. SRB Appeal Panel and the ESAs JBoA, their jurisprudence vis-à-vis discretionary choices of EU banking authorities and whether and how their role could be enhanced for improving a greater accountability. Finally, the article discusses the possible evolution of EU Courts in reviewing banking law, particularly after the 2015-2019 Reforms of CJEU Statute (and those currently ongoing).

The ‘judicial’ control of discretionary measures in banking and financial fields: the role of EU Courts (and Boards of Appeal) / M. Condinanzi. - In: EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW REVIEW. - ISSN 1613-2548. - 19:6(2022 Jul 28), pp. 978-991. [10.1515/ecfr-2022-0035]

The ‘judicial’ control of discretionary measures in banking and financial fields: the role of EU Courts (and Boards of Appeal)

M. Condinanzi
2022

Abstract

The paper aims at reflecting on the judicial control of the discretionary measures in banking and financial fields exercised by the EU Courts, as well as the ‘quasi-judicial’ control, in the same fields, exercised by the Boards of Appeal. Therefore, the present article firstly discusses the EU Courts’ general approach over discretionary acts, assessing the peculiarities of the cases related to decisions taken by banking authorities. Secondly, the papers assessesthe ‘new’ means of quasi-judicial accountability, i.e. SRB Appeal Panel and the ESAs JBoA, their jurisprudence vis-à-vis discretionary choices of EU banking authorities and whether and how their role could be enhanced for improving a greater accountability. Finally, the article discusses the possible evolution of EU Courts in reviewing banking law, particularly after the 2015-2019 Reforms of CJEU Statute (and those currently ongoing).
Settore IUS/14 - Diritto dell'Unione Europea
28-lug-2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
08 2002-06 massimo condinanzi judicial control of discretionary measures 10.1515_ecfr-2022-0035 (1).pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.43 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1011728
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact