In this conversation, Mieke Bal retraces the perimeter of her analytically based art practice and her practice-based theoretical work, taking advantage of the operational concept of frame but also of the many actions it generates – such as framing, unframing, de-framing, and re-framing. She considers the act of framing, understood as a first gesture of interpretation, much more useful than the noun itself for our under-standing of the effects and meanings of art. Framing as an action can also potentially subvert the traditional, linear, and chronological views of time, bringing into question unilateral thinking.
Bridging the gap between theory and practice: A conversation on framing and reframing / M. Bal, C. Baldacci, S. Franco, P. Conte. - In: JOLMA. - ISSN 2723-9640. - 4:1(2023 Sep 25), pp. 13-27. [10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2023/01/001]
Bridging the gap between theory and practice: A conversation on framing and reframing
P. Conte
Co-primo
2023
Abstract
In this conversation, Mieke Bal retraces the perimeter of her analytically based art practice and her practice-based theoretical work, taking advantage of the operational concept of frame but also of the many actions it generates – such as framing, unframing, de-framing, and re-framing. She considers the act of framing, understood as a first gesture of interpretation, much more useful than the noun itself for our under-standing of the effects and meanings of art. Framing as an action can also potentially subvert the traditional, linear, and chronological views of time, bringing into question unilateral thinking.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JoLMA, Bridging the gap.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
634.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
634.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.