Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of LR-3 and LR-4 without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), and identify which features could predict LR-5 progression on serial Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up.Methods: Forty-nine cirrhotic patients with 55 LR-3 and 19 LR-4 without APHE were evaluated. Observations were classified as decreased, stable or increased in category at follow-up. Observation size and LI-RADS major and ancillary features were evaluated.Results: Seventeen/fifty-five (31%) LR-3 and 8/19 (42%) LR-4 progressed to LR-5 at follow-up. Baseline LI-RADS major and ancillary features were not significantly different among LR-3 and LR-4. A diameter >= 10 mm significantly increased LR-5 progression risk of LR-3 (OR = 6.07; 95% CI: 0.12; 60.28]; P < .001). LR-4 with a diameter >= 10 mm more likely become LR-5 at follow-up (OR = 8.95; 95% CI: 0.73; 111.8; P = .083]).Conclusion: LR-3 and LR-4 without APHE were often downgraded or remained stable in category on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up.

Outcome of LR-3 and LR-4 observations without arterial phase hyperenhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up / F. Agnello, D. Albano, G. Sparacia, G. Micci, D. Matranga, P. Toia, L. La Grutta, E. Grassedonio, G. Lo Re, G. Salvaggio, M. Midiri, M. Galia. - In: CLINICAL IMAGING. - ISSN 0899-7071. - 68:(2020 Dec), pp. 169-174. [10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.08.003]

Outcome of LR-3 and LR-4 observations without arterial phase hyperenhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up

D. Albano
Secondo
;
2020

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of LR-3 and LR-4 without arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), and identify which features could predict LR-5 progression on serial Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up.Methods: Forty-nine cirrhotic patients with 55 LR-3 and 19 LR-4 without APHE were evaluated. Observations were classified as decreased, stable or increased in category at follow-up. Observation size and LI-RADS major and ancillary features were evaluated.Results: Seventeen/fifty-five (31%) LR-3 and 8/19 (42%) LR-4 progressed to LR-5 at follow-up. Baseline LI-RADS major and ancillary features were not significantly different among LR-3 and LR-4. A diameter >= 10 mm significantly increased LR-5 progression risk of LR-3 (OR = 6.07; 95% CI: 0.12; 60.28]; P < .001). LR-4 with a diameter >= 10 mm more likely become LR-5 at follow-up (OR = 8.95; 95% CI: 0.73; 111.8; P = .083]).Conclusion: LR-3 and LR-4 without APHE were often downgraded or remained stable in category on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI follow-up.
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI; LI-RADS; LR-3; LR-4
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
dic-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
j.clinimag.2020.08.003.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Body Imaging
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 555.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
555.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1011494
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact