In Classical Armenian some direct objects are marked by the preposition z-. According to the most comprehensive grammars of Classical Armenian the preposition z- would be placed before definite direct objects. This way of marking differently some direct objects is a well-known phenomenon in linguistic typology and it is usually labelled as DOM (Differential Object Marking). The idea that DOM in Classical Armenian would depend on definiteness is challenged by many occurrences of z- before indefinite phrases in Biblical Armenian. The achievements of linguistic typology about DOM and the evidence coming from some passages of the Armenian Bible suggest that the parameters that triggered DOM in Classical Armenian was specificity (closely linked with topic continuity), rather than definiteness. The working hypothesis proposed in the article is that the rule underlying the Classical Armenian DOM should be reconsidered and rewritten as follows: specific direct objects (i.e definite direct objects and indefinite specific direct objects) required the preposition z-, while non-specific indefinite objects were unmarked.

Sulla marcatura differenziale dell'oggetto in armeno classico. Una questione di definitezza? / A. Scala. - In: REVUE DES ÉTUDES ARMÉNIENNES. - ISSN 0080-2549. - 41:(2022), pp. 15-29. [10.2143/REA.41.0.3291876]

Sulla marcatura differenziale dell'oggetto in armeno classico. Una questione di definitezza?

A. Scala
2022

Abstract

In Classical Armenian some direct objects are marked by the preposition z-. According to the most comprehensive grammars of Classical Armenian the preposition z- would be placed before definite direct objects. This way of marking differently some direct objects is a well-known phenomenon in linguistic typology and it is usually labelled as DOM (Differential Object Marking). The idea that DOM in Classical Armenian would depend on definiteness is challenged by many occurrences of z- before indefinite phrases in Biblical Armenian. The achievements of linguistic typology about DOM and the evidence coming from some passages of the Armenian Bible suggest that the parameters that triggered DOM in Classical Armenian was specificity (closely linked with topic continuity), rather than definiteness. The working hypothesis proposed in the article is that the rule underlying the Classical Armenian DOM should be reconsidered and rewritten as follows: specific direct objects (i.e definite direct objects and indefinite specific direct objects) required the preposition z-, while non-specific indefinite objects were unmarked.
Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia e Linguistica
2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
06. Scala.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 453.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
453.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1007672
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact