IntroductionAlthough tumor size (TS) is known to affect surgical outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its impact on laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH) is not well studied. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of TS on the perioperative outcomes of L-MH and to elucidate the optimal TS cutoff for stratifying the difficulty of L-MH.MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of 3008 patients who underwent L-MH at 48 international centers. A total 1396 patients met study criteria and were included. The impact of TS cutoffs was investigated by stratifying TS at each 10-mm interval. The optimal cutoffs were determined taking into consideration the number of endpoints which showed a statistically significant split around the cut-points of interest and the magnitude of relative risk after correction for multiple risk factors.ResultsWe identified 2 optimal TS cutoffs, 50 mm and 100 mm, which segregated L-MH into 3 groups. An increasing TS across these 3 groups (& LE; 50 mm, 51-100 mm, > 100 mm), was significantly associated with a higher open conversion rate (11.2%, 14.7%, 23.0%, P < 0.001), longer operating time (median, 340 min, 346 min, 365 min, P = 0.025), increased blood loss (median, 300 ml, ml, 400 ml, P = 0.002) and higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusion (13.1%, 15.9%, 27.6%, P < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes such as overall morbidity, major morbidity, and length of stay were comparable across the three groups.ConclusionIncreasing TS was associated with poorer intraoperative but not postoperative outcomes after L-MH. We determined 2 TS cutoffs (50 mm and 10 mm) which could optimally stratify the surgical difficulty of L-MH.

Impact of Tumor Size on the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study / Y. Kato, A. Sugioka, M. Kojima, N.L. Syn, W. Zhongkai, R. Liu, F. Cipriani, T. Armstrong, D.L. Aghayan, T. Siow, C. Lim, O. Scatton, P. Herman, F.F. Coelho, M.V. Marino, V. Mazzaferro, A.K.H. Chiow, I. Sucandy, A. Ivanecz, S.H. Choi, J.H. Lee, M. Gastaca, M. Vivarelli, F. Giuliante, B. Dalla Valle, A. Ruzzenente, C. Yong, C. Fondevila, M. Efanov, F. Di Benedetto, A. Belli, J.O. Park, F. Rotellar, G. Choi, R. Robles-Campos, X. Wang, R.P. Sutcliffe, M. Schmelzle, J. Pratschke, E.C.H. Lai, C.C.N. Chong, M. D'Hondt, K. Monden, S. Lopez-Ben, T.P. Kingham, F. Forchino, A. Ferrero, G.M. Ettorre, G.B. Levi Sandri, F. Pascual, D. Cherqui, O. Soubrane, G. Wakabayashi, R.I. Troisi, T. Cheung, Z. Chen, M. Yin, M. D'Silva, H. Han, P.P. Nghia, T.C.D. Long, B. Edwin, D. Fuks, K. Chen, M. Abu Hilal, L. Aldrighetti, B.K.P. Goh. - In: ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1068-9265. - (2023). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1245/s10434-023-13863-z]

Impact of Tumor Size on the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study

V. Mazzaferro;
2023

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough tumor size (TS) is known to affect surgical outcomes in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its impact on laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH) is not well studied. The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of TS on the perioperative outcomes of L-MH and to elucidate the optimal TS cutoff for stratifying the difficulty of L-MH.MethodsThis was a post-hoc analysis of 3008 patients who underwent L-MH at 48 international centers. A total 1396 patients met study criteria and were included. The impact of TS cutoffs was investigated by stratifying TS at each 10-mm interval. The optimal cutoffs were determined taking into consideration the number of endpoints which showed a statistically significant split around the cut-points of interest and the magnitude of relative risk after correction for multiple risk factors.ResultsWe identified 2 optimal TS cutoffs, 50 mm and 100 mm, which segregated L-MH into 3 groups. An increasing TS across these 3 groups (& LE; 50 mm, 51-100 mm, > 100 mm), was significantly associated with a higher open conversion rate (11.2%, 14.7%, 23.0%, P < 0.001), longer operating time (median, 340 min, 346 min, 365 min, P = 0.025), increased blood loss (median, 300 ml, ml, 400 ml, P = 0.002) and higher rate of intraoperative blood transfusion (13.1%, 15.9%, 27.6%, P < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes such as overall morbidity, major morbidity, and length of stay were comparable across the three groups.ConclusionIncreasing TS was associated with poorer intraoperative but not postoperative outcomes after L-MH. We determined 2 TS cutoffs (50 mm and 10 mm) which could optimally stratify the surgical difficulty of L-MH.
Difficulty; Laparoscopic liver resection; Major hepatectomy; Minimally invasive liver; Size
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
2023
28-lug-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Yutaro Kato s10434-023-13863-z.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 535.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
535.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1002009
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact