AIM: To assess success and complication rates of routinely-performed ERCP in a regional setting, and the priority quality indicators for ERCP practice. METHODS: Prospective region wide observational study on consecutive patients undergoing ERCP during a 6-month period. A centralized online ERCP questionnaire was built and used for data storage. Primary quality indicators provided by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) were considered. RESULTS: 38 endoscopists from 18 centers performed a total of 2388 ERCP. The most common indication for ERCP was choledocholitiasis (54.8%) followed by malignant jaundice (22.6%). Cannulation of the desired duct was obtained in 2293 cases (96%) and ERCP was successful in 2176 cases (91.1%). Success and ERCP difficulty were significantly related to the experience of the operator (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). ERCP difficulty was also significantly related to volume centers (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 8.4%: post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred in 4.1% of procedures, bleeding in 2.9%, infection in 0.8%, perforation in 0.4%. Mortality rate was 0.4%. All the ASGE priority quality indicators for ERCP were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The procedural questionnaire proved to be an important tool to assess and verify the quality of routinely-performed ERCP performance in a community setting.

Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance in an Italian regional database study / A. Mariani, S. Segato, A. Anderloni, G. Cengia, M. Parravicini, T. Staiano, G.E. Tontini, D. Lochis, P. Cantu, G. Manfredi, A. Amato, S. Bargiggia, G. Bernasconi, F. Lella, M. Berni Canani, P. Beretta, L. Ferraris, S. Signorelli, G. Pantaleo, G. Manes, P.A. Testoni, A. Prada, E. Iiritano, E. Lesinigo, G.S. Mezzi, G. de Nucci. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 51:7(2019), pp. 978-984. [10.1016/j.dld.2018.12.021]

Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance in an Italian regional database study

S. Segato;A. Anderloni;G.E. Tontini;S. Bargiggia;
2019

Abstract

AIM: To assess success and complication rates of routinely-performed ERCP in a regional setting, and the priority quality indicators for ERCP practice. METHODS: Prospective region wide observational study on consecutive patients undergoing ERCP during a 6-month period. A centralized online ERCP questionnaire was built and used for data storage. Primary quality indicators provided by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) were considered. RESULTS: 38 endoscopists from 18 centers performed a total of 2388 ERCP. The most common indication for ERCP was choledocholitiasis (54.8%) followed by malignant jaundice (22.6%). Cannulation of the desired duct was obtained in 2293 cases (96%) and ERCP was successful in 2176 cases (91.1%). Success and ERCP difficulty were significantly related to the experience of the operator (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). ERCP difficulty was also significantly related to volume centers (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 8.4%: post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) occurred in 4.1% of procedures, bleeding in 2.9%, infection in 0.8%, perforation in 0.4%. Mortality rate was 0.4%. All the ASGE priority quality indicators for ERCP were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The procedural questionnaire proved to be an important tool to assess and verify the quality of routinely-performed ERCP performance in a community setting.
Complications; ERCP; Post-ERCP pancreatitis; Quality indicators
Settore MED/12 - Gastroenterologia
2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 590.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
590.64 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/686874
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact