The author’s point of departure is Alf Ross’s analysis of ownership as a tool of presentation for a set of disjunctive conditioning facts and conjunctive legal consequences. The author first analyses Ross’s conjunctive compo-nent, and shows that, if one adopts the perspective of Polish-Russian legal realism, it can be pro-vided with a full-blown meaning. Then, the disjunctive component is discussed. By drawing in-spiration from prototype theory, the author argues that a specific set of disjunctive conditioning facts and of conjunctive legal consequences can be regarded as making up the core – albeit in a gradual way - of ownership phenomena, provided that one restricts them to movables. Finally, the author presents two Freudian hypotheses that can explain the emergence of the prototype of own-ership. This explanation is based on the way babies conceive of their bodily parts and feces. Based on that, an archeotype (i.e., archaic conception) of ownership is proposed.

Prototypizing and archeotypizing ownership: A pilot study / E. Fittipaldi. - In: SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 0390-0851. - 46:2(2019), pp. 43-62. [Epub ahead of print]

Prototypizing and archeotypizing ownership: A pilot study

E. Fittipaldi
2019

Abstract

The author’s point of departure is Alf Ross’s analysis of ownership as a tool of presentation for a set of disjunctive conditioning facts and conjunctive legal consequences. The author first analyses Ross’s conjunctive compo-nent, and shows that, if one adopts the perspective of Polish-Russian legal realism, it can be pro-vided with a full-blown meaning. Then, the disjunctive component is discussed. By drawing in-spiration from prototype theory, the author argues that a specific set of disjunctive conditioning facts and of conjunctive legal consequences can be regarded as making up the core – albeit in a gradual way - of ownership phenomena, provided that one restricts them to movables. Finally, the author presents two Freudian hypotheses that can explain the emergence of the prototype of own-ership. This explanation is based on the way babies conceive of their bodily parts and feces. Based on that, an archeotype (i.e., archaic conception) of ownership is proposed.
Ownership; Tû-tû; Prototype theory; Polish-Russian legal realism; Psychoanalysis;
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto
2019
https://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?anno=2019&idRivista=51&lingua=it
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
02+.ftt.fittipaldi.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 363.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
363.68 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/652441
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact