Kant’s theory of the Highest Good has often been criticised as eudemonist or heteronomous. The paper first shows that Kant explicitly differentiated between Eudemonia and Heteronomy. It then analyses separately the two criticisms referred to. According to the analysis provided in the paper, the only criticism that must be accounted for, within the defined terminological framework, is that of heteronomy. The third part of the paper proposes an interpretation of Kant’s ethics which aims to prove that such criticism is not well-founded. The final section of the paper assesses Kantian eudemonism within the context of Stoicism and Epicureanism as Kant’s sources.

Das höchste Gut: Kants Eudämonismus unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Jahre 1781-85 / E. Oggionni. - 6:1(2014 May 16), pp. 76-89.

Das höchste Gut: Kants Eudämonismus unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Jahre 1781-85

E. Oggionni
2014

Abstract

Kant’s theory of the Highest Good has often been criticised as eudemonist or heteronomous. The paper first shows that Kant explicitly differentiated between Eudemonia and Heteronomy. It then analyses separately the two criticisms referred to. According to the analysis provided in the paper, the only criticism that must be accounted for, within the defined terminological framework, is that of heteronomy. The third part of the paper proposes an interpretation of Kant’s ethics which aims to prove that such criticism is not well-founded. The final section of the paper assesses Kantian eudemonism within the context of Stoicism and Epicureanism as Kant’s sources.
Settore M-FIL/06 - Storia della Filosofia
Settore M-FIL/03 - Filosofia Morale
16-mag-2014
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/236442
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact