In cardiovascular variability analysis, the significance of the coupling between two time series is commonly assessed by setting a threshold level in the coherence function. While traditionally used statistical tests consider only the parameters of the adopted estimator, the required zero-coherence level may be affected by some features of the observed series. In this study, three procedures, based on the generation of surrogate series sharing given properties with the original but being structurally uncoupled, were considered: independent identically distributed (IID), Fourier transform (FT), and autoregressive (AR). IID surrogates maintained the distribution of the original series, while FT and AR surrogates preserved the power spectrum. The ability of the three methods to define the threshold for zero coherence was validated and compared by computer simulations reproducing typical cardiovascular interactions. While the IID threshold depended only on record length and design parameters of the coherence estimator, FT and AR thresholds were frequency-dependent with peaks corresponding to the local maxima of the estimated coherence. FT and AR surrogates were able to compensate spurious coherence peaks due to equal-frequency but independent oscillations in the two series. The benefit of frequency-dependent thresholds was evident for short series with narrow-band oscillations. Thus, surrogates preserving the power spectrum of the original series are recommended to avoid false coupling detections in the presence of oscillations occurring at nearby frequencies but produced by different mechanisms, as may frequently happen in cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory regulation.

Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function / L. Faes, G.D. Pinna, A. Porta, R. Maestri, G.D. Nollo. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 0018-9294. - 51:7(2004), pp. 1156-1166. [10.1109/TBME.2004.827271]

Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function.

A. Porta;
2004

Abstract

In cardiovascular variability analysis, the significance of the coupling between two time series is commonly assessed by setting a threshold level in the coherence function. While traditionally used statistical tests consider only the parameters of the adopted estimator, the required zero-coherence level may be affected by some features of the observed series. In this study, three procedures, based on the generation of surrogate series sharing given properties with the original but being structurally uncoupled, were considered: independent identically distributed (IID), Fourier transform (FT), and autoregressive (AR). IID surrogates maintained the distribution of the original series, while FT and AR surrogates preserved the power spectrum. The ability of the three methods to define the threshold for zero coherence was validated and compared by computer simulations reproducing typical cardiovascular interactions. While the IID threshold depended only on record length and design parameters of the coherence estimator, FT and AR thresholds were frequency-dependent with peaks corresponding to the local maxima of the estimated coherence. FT and AR surrogates were able to compensate spurious coherence peaks due to equal-frequency but independent oscillations in the two series. The benefit of frequency-dependent thresholds was evident for short series with narrow-band oscillations. Thus, surrogates preserving the power spectrum of the original series are recommended to avoid false coupling detections in the presence of oscillations occurring at nearby frequencies but produced by different mechanisms, as may frequently happen in cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory regulation.
Settore ING-INF/06 - Bioingegneria Elettronica e Informatica
2004
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/18207
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 40
  • Scopus 152
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 134
social impact