The evaluation of patterns in the residuals of model estimates vs. other variables can be useful in both model evaluation and parameter calibration. New indices that allow quantifying such patterns (pattern indices) are presented. Groups of residuals are created by dividing the range of the variable under evaluation into two, three, four, or five subranges. Two types of indices are proposed. The first type (PI-type) is based on the absolute value of the maximum difference between pairwise comparisons among average residuals of each group of residuals. A variant of this index is computed by using variance ratios (PI-F type). The subranges of the variable that determines the grouping of residuals may be of equal length (PI) or variable length (PIv). In the second case, they are generated by an algorithm that optimizes subranges to maximize patterns. The power of the diverse pattern indices at identifying patterns was investigated, and their effectiveness was compared against the runs test. Critical values for pattern indices were generated by Monte Carlo simulations. Monte Carlo probability tables, the results of power analysis, and the results of using pattern indices at two case studies (i.e., daily radiation and soil water content estimates) were presented. The analysis based on pattern indices provided insight in model structure and parameter calibration. Pattern indices also allowed evaluating model performance and discriminating among alternative models. Higher power in identifying patterns was given by range-based pattern indices than by those based on variance ratios.

New indices to quantify patterns of residuals produced by model estimates / M. Donatelli, M. Acutis, G. Bellocchi. - In: AGRONOMY JOURNAL. - ISSN 0002-1962. - 96:3(2004), pp. 631-645.

New indices to quantify patterns of residuals produced by model estimates

M. Acutis
Secondo
;
2004

Abstract

The evaluation of patterns in the residuals of model estimates vs. other variables can be useful in both model evaluation and parameter calibration. New indices that allow quantifying such patterns (pattern indices) are presented. Groups of residuals are created by dividing the range of the variable under evaluation into two, three, four, or five subranges. Two types of indices are proposed. The first type (PI-type) is based on the absolute value of the maximum difference between pairwise comparisons among average residuals of each group of residuals. A variant of this index is computed by using variance ratios (PI-F type). The subranges of the variable that determines the grouping of residuals may be of equal length (PI) or variable length (PIv). In the second case, they are generated by an algorithm that optimizes subranges to maximize patterns. The power of the diverse pattern indices at identifying patterns was investigated, and their effectiveness was compared against the runs test. Critical values for pattern indices were generated by Monte Carlo simulations. Monte Carlo probability tables, the results of power analysis, and the results of using pattern indices at two case studies (i.e., daily radiation and soil water content estimates) were presented. The analysis based on pattern indices provided insight in model structure and parameter calibration. Pattern indices also allowed evaluating model performance and discriminating among alternative models. Higher power in identifying patterns was given by range-based pattern indices than by those based on variance ratios.
Settore AGR/02 - Agronomia e Coltivazioni Erbacee
2004
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/13907
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact