Raised intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important risk factor for developing glaucoma, the second commonest cause of blindness globally. Understanding associations with IOP and variations in IOP between countries may teach us about mechanisms underlying glaucoma. We examined cross-sectional associations with IOP in 43,500 European adults from 12 cohort studies belonging to the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) consortium. Each study conducted multivariable linear regression with IOP as the outcome variable and results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. The association of standardized study IOP with latitude was tested using meta-regression. Higher IOP was observed in men (0.18 mmHg; 95 % CI 0.06, 0.31; P = 0.004) and with higher body mass index (0.21 mmHg per 5 kg/m2; 95 % CI 0.14, 0.28; P < 0.001), shorter height (−0.17 mmHg per 10 cm; 95 % CI –0.25, −0.08; P < 0.001), higher systolic blood pressure (0.17 mmHg per 10 mmHg; 95 % CI 0.12, 0.22; P < 0.001) and more myopic refraction (0.06 mmHg per Dioptre; 95 % CI 0.03, 0.09; P < 0.001). An inverted U-shaped trend was observed between age and IOP, with IOP increasing up to the age of 60 and decreasing in participants older than 70 years. We found no significant association between standardized IOP and study location latitude (P = 0.76). Novel findings of our study include the association of lower IOP in taller people and an inverted-U shaped association of IOP with age. We found no evidence of significant variation in IOP across Europe. Despite the limited range of latitude amongst included studies, this finding is in favour of collaborative pooling of data from studies examining environmental and genetic determinants of IOP in Europeans.

Associations with intraocular pressure across Europe : The European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium / A.P. Khawaja, H. Springelkamp, C. Creuzot-Garcher, C. Delcourt, A. Hofman, R. Hohn, A.I. Iglesias, R.C.W. Wolfs, J.-. Korobelnik, R. Silva, F. Topouzis, K.M. Williams, A.M. Bron, G.H.S. Buitendijk, M.L. Cachulo, A. Cougnard-Gregoire, J.-. Dartigues, C.J. Hammond, N. Pfeiffer, A. Salonikiou, C.M. van Duijn, J.R. Vingerling, R.N. Luben, A. Mirshahi, J. Lamparter, C.C.W. Klaver, N.M. Jansonius, P.J. Foster, C. On behalf of the European Eye Epidemiology (E), N. Acar, E. Anastosopoulos, A. Azuara-Blanco, A. Bergen, G. Bertelsen, C. Binquet, A. Bird, L. Bretillon, G. Buitendijk, U. Chakravarthy, M. Chan, P. Chang, A. Colijn, P. Cumberland, J. Cunha-Vaz, V. Daien, G. Deak, M.-. Delyfer, A. Hollander, M. Dietzel, M.G. Erke, S. Fauser, R. Finger, A. Fletcher, P. Founti, A. Gobel, T. Gorgels, J. Grauslund, F. Grus, C. Helmer, H.-. Hense, M. Hermann, R. Hoehn, R. Hogg, F. Holz, C. Hoyng, S. Janssen, C. Klaver, M. Le Goff, S. Leal, Y. Lechanteur, T. Lehtimaki, A. Lotery, I. Leung, M. Mauschitz, B. Merle, V. Meyer zu Westrup, E. Midena, S. Miotto, S. Mohan-Said, A. Muldrew, M. Mueller, S. Nunes, K. Oexle, T. Peto, S. Piermarocchi, E. Prokofyeva, J. Rahi, O. Raitakari, L. Ribeiro, M.-. Rougier, J. Sahel, C. Sanchez, S. Schmitz-Valckenberg, C. Schweitzer, T. Segato, J. Shehata, G. Silvestri, C. Simader, E. Souied, R. Tapp, V. Verhoeven, T. Von Hanno, S. Vujosevic, C. Wolfram, J. Yip, J. Zerbib, I. Zwiener. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY. - ISSN 0393-2990. - 31:11(2016 Nov), pp. 1101-1111. [10.1007/s10654-016-0191-1]

Associations with intraocular pressure across Europe : The European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium

S. Vujosevic;
2016

Abstract

Raised intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important risk factor for developing glaucoma, the second commonest cause of blindness globally. Understanding associations with IOP and variations in IOP between countries may teach us about mechanisms underlying glaucoma. We examined cross-sectional associations with IOP in 43,500 European adults from 12 cohort studies belonging to the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) consortium. Each study conducted multivariable linear regression with IOP as the outcome variable and results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. The association of standardized study IOP with latitude was tested using meta-regression. Higher IOP was observed in men (0.18 mmHg; 95 % CI 0.06, 0.31; P = 0.004) and with higher body mass index (0.21 mmHg per 5 kg/m2; 95 % CI 0.14, 0.28; P < 0.001), shorter height (−0.17 mmHg per 10 cm; 95 % CI –0.25, −0.08; P < 0.001), higher systolic blood pressure (0.17 mmHg per 10 mmHg; 95 % CI 0.12, 0.22; P < 0.001) and more myopic refraction (0.06 mmHg per Dioptre; 95 % CI 0.03, 0.09; P < 0.001). An inverted U-shaped trend was observed between age and IOP, with IOP increasing up to the age of 60 and decreasing in participants older than 70 years. We found no significant association between standardized IOP and study location latitude (P = 0.76). Novel findings of our study include the association of lower IOP in taller people and an inverted-U shaped association of IOP with age. We found no evidence of significant variation in IOP across Europe. Despite the limited range of latitude amongst included studies, this finding is in favour of collaborative pooling of data from studies examining environmental and genetic determinants of IOP in Europeans.
Blood pressure; Body mass index; Epidemiology; Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Refractive errors; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Europe; Female; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension
Settore MED/30 - Malattie Apparato Visivo
nov-2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EEIgroup2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 929.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
929.2 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Khawaja2016_Article_AssociationsWithIntraocularPre.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/884488
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact