Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of resection margin status in patients with KRAS mutations (mt-KRAS) when compared to those with wild-type KRAS (wt-KRAS) on long-term outcomes in patients with resected CRLM. Methods: All patients who underwent resection of CRLM with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a KRAS type recorded were included in the study. Overall survival (OS), as well as death-censored overall (RFS) and liver-specific (LS-RFS) recurrence-free survival between KRAS types and the margin status within KRAS subgroups were compared using Cox regression models. Results: Data were available for N = 500 patients (30.4% mt-KRAS). mt-KRAS status was independently associated with significantly shorter OS. Within the wt-KRAS subgroup, smaller margins were found to be associated with significantly shorter death-censored LS-RFS (p < 0.001), with HRs of 1.93 (p = 0.005) for 1–4 mm margins and 2.83 (p < 0.001) for <1 mm margins, relative to those with clear margins. No such association was observed in the mt-KRAS subgroup (p = 0.721). Conclusion: The resection margin status is of greater importance in patients with wt-KRAS. Such information could be useful in the operative planning, especially for those with multiple metastatic deposits, and also in the post-operative counselling and surveillance based on the margin and KRAS status.

The effects of resection margin and KRAS status on outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases / A.A.Z. Hatta, A.M. Pathanki, J. Hodson, R.P. Sutcliffe, R. Marudanayagam, K.J. Roberts, N. Chatzizacharias, J. Isaac, P. Muiesan, P. Taniere, D.F. Mirza, B.V.M. Dasari. - In: HPB. - ISSN 1365-182X. - 23:1(2021), pp. 90-98. [10.1016/j.hpb.2020.04.016]

The effects of resection margin and KRAS status on outcomes after resection of colorectal liver metastases

P. Muiesan;
2021

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of resection margin status in patients with KRAS mutations (mt-KRAS) when compared to those with wild-type KRAS (wt-KRAS) on long-term outcomes in patients with resected CRLM. Methods: All patients who underwent resection of CRLM with curative intent between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a KRAS type recorded were included in the study. Overall survival (OS), as well as death-censored overall (RFS) and liver-specific (LS-RFS) recurrence-free survival between KRAS types and the margin status within KRAS subgroups were compared using Cox regression models. Results: Data were available for N = 500 patients (30.4% mt-KRAS). mt-KRAS status was independently associated with significantly shorter OS. Within the wt-KRAS subgroup, smaller margins were found to be associated with significantly shorter death-censored LS-RFS (p < 0.001), with HRs of 1.93 (p = 0.005) for 1–4 mm margins and 2.83 (p < 0.001) for <1 mm margins, relative to those with clear margins. No such association was observed in the mt-KRAS subgroup (p = 0.721). Conclusion: The resection margin status is of greater importance in patients with wt-KRAS. Such information could be useful in the operative planning, especially for those with multiple metastatic deposits, and also in the post-operative counselling and surveillance based on the margin and KRAS status.
Hepatectomy; Humans; Margins of Excision; Mutation; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Colorectal Neoplasms; Liver Neoplasms
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
2021
HPB
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020-The effects of resection margin and KRAS.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 651.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
651.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/883472
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact