Introduction: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition of breast tumor with different subtypes, considered a disease with worse prognosis; treatments and survival are often unclear and conflicting. Methods: We consecutively collected 153 primary MBCs of different subtypes. Breast surgery, neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, clinic-pathological factors, number and type of events during follow-up were considered to evaluate overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Results: The majority of MBC was triple-negative (TN) subtype (88.7%), G3 (95.3%), pN0 (70.6%), and with high levels of Ki-67 (93.5%). For OS and IDFS, no significant associations were seen between the different MBC subtypes. The matched triple-negative MBC (TNMBC) and ductal TNBC cohorts had similar prognosis both in terms of OS (p =.411) and IDFS (p =.981). We observed a positive trend for TNMBC patients treated in the adjuvant setting with the cyclofosfamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil protocol for better OS (p =.090) and IDFS (p =.087). A poor or absent response rate was observed in the neoadjuvant setting. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that metaplastic and ductal breast cancers with TN phenotype are similar in terms of overall and disease-free survival. Metaplastic cancers are poorly responsive to neoadjuvant treatment, and in the absence of novel targeted therapies, surgical treatment remains the first choice.

Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic considerations / G. Corso, S. Frassoni, A. Girardi, E. De Camilli, E. Montagna, M. Intra, L. Bottiglieri, A. Margherita De Scalzi, D.M. Fanianos, F. Magnoni, A. Invento, A. Toesca, F. Conforti, V. Bagnardi, G. Viale, M.A. Colleoni, P. Veronesi. - In: JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-4790. - (2020). [10.1002/jso.26248]

Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic considerations

G. Corso
Primo
;
E. De Camilli;L. Bottiglieri;F. Conforti;G. Viale;P. Veronesi
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Introduction: Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare condition of breast tumor with different subtypes, considered a disease with worse prognosis; treatments and survival are often unclear and conflicting. Methods: We consecutively collected 153 primary MBCs of different subtypes. Breast surgery, neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, clinic-pathological factors, number and type of events during follow-up were considered to evaluate overall survival (OS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Results: The majority of MBC was triple-negative (TN) subtype (88.7%), G3 (95.3%), pN0 (70.6%), and with high levels of Ki-67 (93.5%). For OS and IDFS, no significant associations were seen between the different MBC subtypes. The matched triple-negative MBC (TNMBC) and ductal TNBC cohorts had similar prognosis both in terms of OS (p =.411) and IDFS (p =.981). We observed a positive trend for TNMBC patients treated in the adjuvant setting with the cyclofosfamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil protocol for better OS (p =.090) and IDFS (p =.087). A poor or absent response rate was observed in the neoadjuvant setting. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that metaplastic and ductal breast cancers with TN phenotype are similar in terms of overall and disease-free survival. Metaplastic cancers are poorly responsive to neoadjuvant treatment, and in the absence of novel targeted therapies, surgical treatment remains the first choice.
breast cancer prognosis; chemotherapy treatment; metaplastic breast cancer; primary surgery; triple-negative histotype
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
2020
12-ott-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jso.26248.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.14 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/783850
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact