Background: This pilot study is based on observational research of lecturing skills during the annual Oral Medicine course at the Milan Dentistry School. Aims: Our goals were to explore how teachers exhibited desirable lecturing skills, to observe how their attitudes and lecturing skills affected students' attention and thereby learning, and to provide feedback. Method: We prepared a structured observational grid divided into four categories: explaining, questioning, visual aids, and lecturer attitude. The grid was filled in by a participant, nonactive researcher. Results: Two main types of lecture were observed: "traditional'' and "interactive''. Both of these can result in a high level of attention among students. Among the categories, only "lecturer attitude'' appeared to affect student attention. In particular, the skills of "speaking aloud'' and "sustaining verbal communication with vocal inflection'' appeared to have the greatest impact on lecturer attitude. The data were then presented blindly to the five lecturers, who were able to identify their own lesson. Conclusions: Our grid proved to be a valid instrument although it was very expensive. When integrated with other strategies for improving lecturing, such as student scoring, peer evaluation, and microteaching, observational research can be a cost-effective method to stimulate guided reflection and to improve the lecturing skills of faculty members.

The role of observational research in improving faculty lecturing skills : a qualitative study in an Italian dental school / S. Visioli, G. Lodi, A.M. Carrassi, L. Zannini. - In: MEDICAL TEACHER. - ISSN 0142-159X. - 31:8(2009 Aug), pp. e362-e369. [10.1080/01421590902744860]

The role of observational research in improving faculty lecturing skills : a qualitative study in an Italian dental school

S. Visioli
Primo
;
G. Lodi
Secondo
;
A.M. Carrassi
Penultimo
;
L. Zannini
Ultimo
2009

Abstract

Background: This pilot study is based on observational research of lecturing skills during the annual Oral Medicine course at the Milan Dentistry School. Aims: Our goals were to explore how teachers exhibited desirable lecturing skills, to observe how their attitudes and lecturing skills affected students' attention and thereby learning, and to provide feedback. Method: We prepared a structured observational grid divided into four categories: explaining, questioning, visual aids, and lecturer attitude. The grid was filled in by a participant, nonactive researcher. Results: Two main types of lecture were observed: "traditional'' and "interactive''. Both of these can result in a high level of attention among students. Among the categories, only "lecturer attitude'' appeared to affect student attention. In particular, the skills of "speaking aloud'' and "sustaining verbal communication with vocal inflection'' appeared to have the greatest impact on lecturer attitude. The data were then presented blindly to the five lecturers, who were able to identify their own lesson. Conclusions: Our grid proved to be a valid instrument although it was very expensive. When integrated with other strategies for improving lecturing, such as student scoring, peer evaluation, and microteaching, observational research can be a cost-effective method to stimulate guided reflection and to improve the lecturing skills of faculty members.
12 tips; education; improvement
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
Settore M-PED/01 - Pedagogia Generale e Sociale
ago-2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Visioli et al. in Medical Teacher.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 706.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
706.65 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/72038
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact