Several pathogenetic mechanisms have been postulated to explain the association between endometriosis and subfertility. However, to date, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. In this study, we hypothesized that the reduced exploitation of the natural chances of conception could be an additional detrimental factor. Due to dyspareunia or the need for hormonal treatment to temper pelvic pain, one may expect affected women to exploit less the chances of natural pregnancy. In this cross-sectional study of 292 women undergoing IVF, we investigated the severity of pelvic pain symptoms, the sexual function (using the Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]), and the reproductive strategies of women with (n = 62) and without (n = 230) endometriosis. Basal clinical and demographic characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Conversely, all pelvic pain symptom scores were increased in women with endometriosis. Endometriosis patients also showed greater pain at the FSFI, but no other significant differences were detected as regards sexual function. The use of hormonal contraceptive agents did not differ between the study groups. Moreover, questions aimed at disentangle whether affected women exploited less the natural chances of pregnancy did not reveal any significant difference. In conclusion, this study does not support the hypothesis that women with endometriosis exploit less the chances of natural pregnancy, despite the presence of pelvic pain.

Natural Pregnancy Seeking in Subfertile Women with Endometriosis / E. Somigliana, F. Facchin, A. Busnelli, L. Benaglia, R. Biancardi, A. Catavorello, P. Vercellini. - In: REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES. - ISSN 1933-7205. - 27:1(2020 Jan 01), pp. 389-394. [10.1007/s43032-019-00068-7]

Natural Pregnancy Seeking in Subfertile Women with Endometriosis

E. Somigliana
Primo
;
A. Busnelli;L. Benaglia;R. Biancardi;P. Vercellini
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Several pathogenetic mechanisms have been postulated to explain the association between endometriosis and subfertility. However, to date, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. In this study, we hypothesized that the reduced exploitation of the natural chances of conception could be an additional detrimental factor. Due to dyspareunia or the need for hormonal treatment to temper pelvic pain, one may expect affected women to exploit less the chances of natural pregnancy. In this cross-sectional study of 292 women undergoing IVF, we investigated the severity of pelvic pain symptoms, the sexual function (using the Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI]), and the reproductive strategies of women with (n = 62) and without (n = 230) endometriosis. Basal clinical and demographic characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Conversely, all pelvic pain symptom scores were increased in women with endometriosis. Endometriosis patients also showed greater pain at the FSFI, but no other significant differences were detected as regards sexual function. The use of hormonal contraceptive agents did not differ between the study groups. Moreover, questions aimed at disentangle whether affected women exploited less the natural chances of pregnancy did not reveal any significant difference. In conclusion, this study does not support the hypothesis that women with endometriosis exploit less the chances of natural pregnancy, despite the presence of pelvic pain.
Dyspareunia; Endometriosis; Natural pregnancy; Sexual function
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
1-gen-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Somigliana et al, per AIR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 131.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
131.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/713954
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact