Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) alone or in association with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) for the treatment of partially contained intrabony defects. Methods: A total of 20 two-walled intrabony defects belonging to nine patients were included. Ten defects were treated with EMD alone (test group 1) and the other 10 were treated with EMD and DBBM (test group 2), applying either modified papilla preservation technique or simplified papilla preservation technique. Results: Twelve months after surgery, in the test group 1, PD was 2.8 ± 0.8 mm, REC was 2.3 ± 2.4 mm and CAL was 5.0 ± 2.8 mm, significantly reduced from baseline values (P < 0.05). Likewise, in test group 2, PD, REC and CAL reduced to 3.0 ± 0.7 mm, 3.9 ± 1.5 mm and 6.9 ± 1.1 mm respectively, from baseline values at 12 months (P < 0.05). No significant differences between groups were found. Conclusions: The results showed that the use of EMD alone and the use of a combination of EMD and DBBM for the treatment of partially contained defects showed comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 12 months.

Enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of partially contained intrabony defects: 12-month results / S. Corbella, A. Alberti, E. Calciolari, S. Taschieri, L. Francetti. - In: AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL. - ISSN 0045-0421. - 64:1(2019 Mar), pp. 27-34. [10.1111/adj.12654]

Enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of partially contained intrabony defects: 12-month results

S. Corbella
Primo
;
A. Alberti
Secondo
;
S. Taschieri
Penultimo
;
L. Francetti
Ultimo
2019

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) alone or in association with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) for the treatment of partially contained intrabony defects. Methods: A total of 20 two-walled intrabony defects belonging to nine patients were included. Ten defects were treated with EMD alone (test group 1) and the other 10 were treated with EMD and DBBM (test group 2), applying either modified papilla preservation technique or simplified papilla preservation technique. Results: Twelve months after surgery, in the test group 1, PD was 2.8 ± 0.8 mm, REC was 2.3 ± 2.4 mm and CAL was 5.0 ± 2.8 mm, significantly reduced from baseline values (P < 0.05). Likewise, in test group 2, PD, REC and CAL reduced to 3.0 ± 0.7 mm, 3.9 ± 1.5 mm and 6.9 ± 1.1 mm respectively, from baseline values at 12 months (P < 0.05). No significant differences between groups were found. Conclusions: The results showed that the use of EMD alone and the use of a combination of EMD and DBBM for the treatment of partially contained defects showed comparable clinical and radiographic outcomes after 12 months.
Bone regeneration; enamel matrix derivative; periodontal diseases; periodontal regeneration; periodontitis; Dentistry (all)
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
mar-2019
2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Corbella_et_al-2019-Australian_Dental_Journal.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 653.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
653.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/622555
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact