The literature about piracy flourished just at the end of the Golden Age of pirates (1650-1750). In a mixture of fear and admiration, that literature describes pirates as bloodthirsty champions of liberty, from an anarchic point of view, and of the fight against the official violence, a typical asset of kingdoms and their armies. The hackers' contribution to the conception and birth of the Net is fundamental. But when the web started making the navigation and the electronic purchase of goods easier, the safety of the Net became a big issue, and the hackers gradually became a threat. Similarly to the Golden Century, the room for the hackers is shrinking and their work criminalized. My paper will focus on the use of the word “pirate” and the world of “piracy” to identify who the hackers are and in what their work consists. Why have we assimilated the hackers' work (i.e. opening, looking, learning, adapting, and sharing) to pirate activities? Why in the ‘70s did the hackers themselves identify their work as pirate? What remains of the libertarian ideology? Is there any sort of hackers’ ideology nowadays? Is the battle toward a new concept of intellectual property the way to finally embody the communitarian revolution of the internet? Or is it simply a way to standardize, and so to defuse, the potential revolution of the Net?

Black Beard’s Mouse. From Pirates to Hackers / S. Poier - In: QUADERNO DEI LAVORI 2007 : Proceedings del Terzo Seminario Nazionale di Sociologia del Diritto (AIS- Sezione di Sociologia del Diritto) / [a cura di] M. Verga. - Messina : C.I.R.S.D.I.G, 2008. - ISBN 978-88-95356-05-1. (( Intervento presentato al 3. convegno AIS – SEZIONE DI SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO SEMINARIO NAZIONALE DI SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO tenutosi a Capraia Isola nel 2007.

Black Beard’s Mouse. From Pirates to Hackers

S. Poier
Primo
2008

Abstract

The literature about piracy flourished just at the end of the Golden Age of pirates (1650-1750). In a mixture of fear and admiration, that literature describes pirates as bloodthirsty champions of liberty, from an anarchic point of view, and of the fight against the official violence, a typical asset of kingdoms and their armies. The hackers' contribution to the conception and birth of the Net is fundamental. But when the web started making the navigation and the electronic purchase of goods easier, the safety of the Net became a big issue, and the hackers gradually became a threat. Similarly to the Golden Century, the room for the hackers is shrinking and their work criminalized. My paper will focus on the use of the word “pirate” and the world of “piracy” to identify who the hackers are and in what their work consists. Why have we assimilated the hackers' work (i.e. opening, looking, learning, adapting, and sharing) to pirate activities? Why in the ‘70s did the hackers themselves identify their work as pirate? What remains of the libertarian ideology? Is there any sort of hackers’ ideology nowadays? Is the battle toward a new concept of intellectual property the way to finally embody the communitarian revolution of the internet? Or is it simply a way to standardize, and so to defuse, the potential revolution of the Net?
2008
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/60835
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact