The aims of this paper are to illustrate the trend towards data sharing, i.e. the regulated availability of the original patientlevel data obtained during a study, and to discuss the expected advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of data sharing in radiological research. Expected pros include the potential for verification of original results with alternative or supplementary analyses (including estimation of reproducibility), advancement of knowledge by providing new results by testing new hypotheses (not explored by the original authors) on preexisting databases, larger scale analyses based on individualpatient data, enhanced multidisciplinary cooperation, reduced publication of false studies, improved clinical practice, and reduced cost and time for clinical research. Expected cons are outlined as the risk that the original authors could not exploit the entire potential of the data they obtained, possible failures in patients’ privacy protection, technical barriers such as the lack of standard formats, and possible data misinterpretation. Finally, open issues regarding data ownership, the role of individual patients, advocacy groups and funding institutions in decision making about sharing of data and images are discussed.

To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research / F. Sardanelli, M. Alì, M.G. Hunink, N. Houssami, L.M. Sconfienza, G. Di Leo. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 28:6(2018 Jun), pp. 2328-2335. [10.1007/s00330-017-5165-5]

To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research

F. Sardanelli
Primo
;
M. Alì
Secondo
;
L.M. Sconfienza
Penultimo
;
2018

Abstract

The aims of this paper are to illustrate the trend towards data sharing, i.e. the regulated availability of the original patientlevel data obtained during a study, and to discuss the expected advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of data sharing in radiological research. Expected pros include the potential for verification of original results with alternative or supplementary analyses (including estimation of reproducibility), advancement of knowledge by providing new results by testing new hypotheses (not explored by the original authors) on preexisting databases, larger scale analyses based on individualpatient data, enhanced multidisciplinary cooperation, reduced publication of false studies, improved clinical practice, and reduced cost and time for clinical research. Expected cons are outlined as the risk that the original authors could not exploit the entire potential of the data they obtained, possible failures in patients’ privacy protection, technical barriers such as the lack of standard formats, and possible data misinterpretation. Finally, open issues regarding data ownership, the role of individual patients, advocacy groups and funding institutions in decision making about sharing of data and images are discussed.
confidentiality; data sharing; database; Information dissemination; radiology; radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
giu-2018
18-gen-2018
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.1007-s00330-017-5165-5-2.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 644.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
644.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/549791
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact