Between October 2011 and January 2012, Tunisian and Egyptian citizens experienced their first free, fair and competitive elections to form National Parliaments with constitutional prerogatives. At this occasion, the Islamic parties outperformed in both cases, leaving far behind the other competitors which were mostly the expression of a secular ideology. Such a result revealed the presence of a religious divide that was deemed to be detrimental for the constitution-making process. Yet, Tunisia managed to achieve a democratic installation while Egypt experienced a democratic breakdown following the incompatibility of political divisions between the Islamists parties and their counterparts. The investigation of the causes of this political divide has been a topic vastly discussed among student of comparative politics, democratization and Middle East studies. The present work aims to contribute this debate by testing whether such different outcomes are attributable to different patterns of voting behaviour by recurring to discrete choice modelling on the data furnished by the second Wave of the Arab Barometer project.

Is it a question of religion? : is it a real cleavage? : an analysis of voting behaviour in 2011 elections in Tunisia and Egypt / V. Resta. ((Intervento presentato al 24. convegno World Congress of Political Science: Politics in a World of Inequality tenutosi a Poznan nel 2016.

Is it a question of religion? : is it a real cleavage? : an analysis of voting behaviour in 2011 elections in Tunisia and Egypt

V. Resta
2016

Abstract

Between October 2011 and January 2012, Tunisian and Egyptian citizens experienced their first free, fair and competitive elections to form National Parliaments with constitutional prerogatives. At this occasion, the Islamic parties outperformed in both cases, leaving far behind the other competitors which were mostly the expression of a secular ideology. Such a result revealed the presence of a religious divide that was deemed to be detrimental for the constitution-making process. Yet, Tunisia managed to achieve a democratic installation while Egypt experienced a democratic breakdown following the incompatibility of political divisions between the Islamists parties and their counterparts. The investigation of the causes of this political divide has been a topic vastly discussed among student of comparative politics, democratization and Middle East studies. The present work aims to contribute this debate by testing whether such different outcomes are attributable to different patterns of voting behaviour by recurring to discrete choice modelling on the data furnished by the second Wave of the Arab Barometer project.
lug-2016
Democratization; Electoral Behaviour; Founding elections; Transition; Tunisia; Egypt
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
IPSA
https://wc2016.ipsa.org/my-ipsa/events/istanbul2016/paper/was-it-matter-religious-cleavage-study-deteminants-voting-behaviou
Is it a question of religion? : is it a real cleavage? : an analysis of voting behaviour in 2011 elections in Tunisia and Egypt / V. Resta. ((Intervento presentato al 24. convegno World Congress of Political Science: Politics in a World of Inequality tenutosi a Poznan nel 2016.
Conference Object
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/472948
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact