Within the framework of a comparative analysis of in-work poverty, the Italian case can be of interest not only as a classic example of a Southern European welfare regime, but also because of its high level of internal heterogeneity. Southern Italy – also called the Mezzogiorno – experiences incidences of poverty and in-work poverty that are much higher than those in the Northern and Central regions of Italy. Such a difference is an unavoidable point of departure which has already been highlighted by many scholars and can be a useful analytical tool for better grasping the Italian experience. This is the intention of this chapter, and one that is rhetorically expressed in the title. In other words, we want to study how it is possible – within one historical and political unit – that social and economic processes can diverge so dramatically. The chapter is composed of six sections. Following this introduction, the second section presents the Italian welfare regime in its historical perspective, while the third section treats the different elements of this welfare regime (work, welfare, and family) analytically. On this basis, the fourth section develops some working hypotheses that are then compared with the empirical analysis and findings of the fifth section. In the last section, we attempt to sum up our findings in a comprehensive picture of in-work poverty problems as they relate to the Italian case. Reviews: * ZOË IRVING (2010). Journal of Social Policy, 39 , pp 170-172 doi:10.1017/S0047279409990316 * Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 2010; 39; 100; DOI: 10.1177/0094306109356662a * Massimo Baldini in POLIS, XXIII, 3, dicembre 2009, pp. 505-535.

Two countries in one : the working poor in Italy / F. Biolcati Rinaldi, F. Podestà - In: Working poor in Europe : employment, poverty and globalization / [a cura di] H.-J. Andress, H. Lohmann. - Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. - ISBN 9781847207982. - pp. 203-226

Two countries in one : the working poor in Italy

F. Biolcati Rinaldi
Primo
;
2008

Abstract

Within the framework of a comparative analysis of in-work poverty, the Italian case can be of interest not only as a classic example of a Southern European welfare regime, but also because of its high level of internal heterogeneity. Southern Italy – also called the Mezzogiorno – experiences incidences of poverty and in-work poverty that are much higher than those in the Northern and Central regions of Italy. Such a difference is an unavoidable point of departure which has already been highlighted by many scholars and can be a useful analytical tool for better grasping the Italian experience. This is the intention of this chapter, and one that is rhetorically expressed in the title. In other words, we want to study how it is possible – within one historical and political unit – that social and economic processes can diverge so dramatically. The chapter is composed of six sections. Following this introduction, the second section presents the Italian welfare regime in its historical perspective, while the third section treats the different elements of this welfare regime (work, welfare, and family) analytically. On this basis, the fourth section develops some working hypotheses that are then compared with the empirical analysis and findings of the fifth section. In the last section, we attempt to sum up our findings in a comprehensive picture of in-work poverty problems as they relate to the Italian case. Reviews: * ZOË IRVING (2010). Journal of Social Policy, 39 , pp 170-172 doi:10.1017/S0047279409990316 * Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 2010; 39; 100; DOI: 10.1177/0094306109356662a * Massimo Baldini in POLIS, XXIII, 3, dicembre 2009, pp. 505-535.
Settore SPS/07 - Sociologia Generale
2008
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/46687
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact