Meta-analises are frequently criticized because in most cases they are compiled from quite heterogeneous studies. In spite of this limitation meta-analises are increasingly published because in many areas of clinical research the results of indiidual studies are devoid of statistical power and end up with conflicting results. Meta-analyses, if performed with a rigorous and exhaustive search of all accountable information on a specific topic have the pontetial of overcoming the drawbacks of single studies and, in addition, of adjusting for pubblication bias and interstudy variability. These strengts of meta-analyses can be exploited to provide conclusive answers on diagnostic and therapeutic issue being debated, wich in turn may help guide doctors toward more rational decisions.
The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice : the benefits / A. Morganti. - In: JN. JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY. - ISSN 1121-8428. - 20:Suppl.12(2007), pp. S1-S3.
The impact of meta-analyses on clinical practice : the benefits
A. MorgantiPrimo
2007
Abstract
Meta-analises are frequently criticized because in most cases they are compiled from quite heterogeneous studies. In spite of this limitation meta-analises are increasingly published because in many areas of clinical research the results of indiidual studies are devoid of statistical power and end up with conflicting results. Meta-analyses, if performed with a rigorous and exhaustive search of all accountable information on a specific topic have the pontetial of overcoming the drawbacks of single studies and, in addition, of adjusting for pubblication bias and interstudy variability. These strengts of meta-analyses can be exploited to provide conclusive answers on diagnostic and therapeutic issue being debated, wich in turn may help guide doctors toward more rational decisions.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.