Background: Whether all the small (φ≤20mm) non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) should be routinely resected is unclear. Aim: To assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with small pNENs, followed-up with different management options. Material and methods: Between 2007-2014, 51 patients were newly diagnosed with pNEN. 15 patients with pNENs φ ≤20 mm underwent an intensive follow-up at 3-month intervals during the first year and then every 6 months (FU pNEN group). They were all at TNM stage I, except for one patient at stage IIA. 21 patients underwent surgical resection (SR pNEN group): 2 patients were at TNM stage I, 9 IIA, one IIIB, 9 IV. 15 patients received systemic therapy (ST pNEN group) due to advanced disease or contraindications to surgery: 5 were at stage IIA, 2 IIB, 8 IV. Results: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 50 months. Survival was similar in the FU and SR pNEN groups, but significantly worst in the ST pNEN patients (log-rank test P < 0.05). The 4-year survival rate was 100% in the FU pNEN group, 90.5% among the SR pNEN patients, 61% for the ST pNEN ones (p < 0.0001). The disease remained stable in all but one patient in the FU pNEN group, whereas six patients in the SR group and five in the ST group showed disease progression. Conclusions: The "wait-and-watch" approach to early-stage small pNENs appears to be safe although further studies are needed to confirm these results in larger cohorts of patients.

A wait-and-watch approach to small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors : Prognosis and survival / S. Massironi, R.E. Rossi, A. Zilli, G. Casazza, C. Ciafardini, D. Conte. - In: ONCOTARGET. - ISSN 1949-2553. - 7:14(2016), pp. 18978-18983.

A wait-and-watch approach to small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors : Prognosis and survival

S. Massironi
;
R.E. Rossi
Secondo
;
A. Zilli;G. Casazza;C. Ciafardini
Penultimo
;
D. Conte
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

Background: Whether all the small (φ≤20mm) non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) should be routinely resected is unclear. Aim: To assess the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with small pNENs, followed-up with different management options. Material and methods: Between 2007-2014, 51 patients were newly diagnosed with pNEN. 15 patients with pNENs φ ≤20 mm underwent an intensive follow-up at 3-month intervals during the first year and then every 6 months (FU pNEN group). They were all at TNM stage I, except for one patient at stage IIA. 21 patients underwent surgical resection (SR pNEN group): 2 patients were at TNM stage I, 9 IIA, one IIIB, 9 IV. 15 patients received systemic therapy (ST pNEN group) due to advanced disease or contraindications to surgery: 5 were at stage IIA, 2 IIB, 8 IV. Results: The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 50 months. Survival was similar in the FU and SR pNEN groups, but significantly worst in the ST pNEN patients (log-rank test P < 0.05). The 4-year survival rate was 100% in the FU pNEN group, 90.5% among the SR pNEN patients, 61% for the ST pNEN ones (p < 0.0001). The disease remained stable in all but one patient in the FU pNEN group, whereas six patients in the SR group and five in the ST group showed disease progression. Conclusions: The "wait-and-watch" approach to early-stage small pNENs appears to be safe although further studies are needed to confirm these results in larger cohorts of patients.
neuroendocrine tumors; non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms; PNEN; oncology
Settore MED/12 - Gastroenterologia
2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MassironiConte_Background Whether_OncoTarget_2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/432820
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact