Craniofacial superimposition is a technique potentially useful for the identification of unidentified human remains if a photo of the missing person is available. We have tested the reliability of the 2D-3D computer-aided nonautomatic superimposition techniques. Three-dimension laser scans of five skulls and ten photographs were overlaid with an imaging software. The resulting superimpositions were evaluated using three methods: craniofacial landmarks, morphological features, and a combination of the two. A 3D model of each skull without its mandible was tested for superimposition; we also evaluated whether separating skulls by sex would increase correct identifications. Results show that the landmark method employing the entire skull is the more reliable one (5/5 correct identifications, 40% false positives [FP]), regardless of sex. However, the persistence of a high percentage of FP in all the methods evaluated indicates that these methods are unreliable for positive identification although the landmark-only method could be useful for exclusion.

Reliability of Craniofacial Superimposition Using Three-Dimension Skull Model / D. Gaudio, L. Olivieri, D. De Angelis, P. Poppa, A. Galassi, C. Cattaneo. - In: JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES. - ISSN 0022-1198. - 61:1(2016), pp. 5-11. [10.1111/1556-4029.12856]

Reliability of Craniofacial Superimposition Using Three-Dimension Skull Model

D. Gaudio
;
D. De Angelis;P. Poppa;A. Galassi
Penultimo
;
C. Cattaneo
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

Craniofacial superimposition is a technique potentially useful for the identification of unidentified human remains if a photo of the missing person is available. We have tested the reliability of the 2D-3D computer-aided nonautomatic superimposition techniques. Three-dimension laser scans of five skulls and ten photographs were overlaid with an imaging software. The resulting superimpositions were evaluated using three methods: craniofacial landmarks, morphological features, and a combination of the two. A 3D model of each skull without its mandible was tested for superimposition; we also evaluated whether separating skulls by sex would increase correct identifications. Results show that the landmark method employing the entire skull is the more reliable one (5/5 correct identifications, 40% false positives [FP]), regardless of sex. However, the persistence of a high percentage of FP in all the methods evaluated indicates that these methods are unreliable for positive identification although the landmark-only method could be useful for exclusion.
Craniofacial superimposition; Forensic anthropology; Forensic science; Laser scanner; Personal identification; Skull-photo overlay; Three-dimension (3D) skull model; 2734; Genetics
Settore MED/43 - Medicina Legale
2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gaudio_et_al-2016-Journal_of_Forensic_Sciences.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 635.09 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
635.09 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/426353
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact