Plant food supplements (PFS) are products of increasing popularity and wide-spread distribution. Nevertheless, information about their risks is limited. To fill this gap, a poisons centres-based study was performed as part of the EU project PlantLIBRA. Multicentre retrospective review of data from selected European and Brazilian poisons centres, involving human cases of adverse effects due to plants consumed as food or as ingredients of food supplements recorded between 2006 and 2010. Ten poisons centres provided a total of 75 cases. In 57 cases (76%) a PFS was involved; in 18 (24%) a plant was ingested as food. The 10 most frequently reported plants were Valeriana officinalis, Camellia sinensis, Paullinia cupana, Melissa officinalis, Passiflora incarnata, Mentha piperita, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Ilex paraguariensis, Panax ginseng, and Citrus aurantium. The most frequently observed clinical effects were neurotoxicity and gastro-intestinal symptoms. Most cases showed a benign clinical course; however, five cases were severe. PFS-related adverse effects seem to be relatively infrequent issues for poisons centres. Most cases showed mild symptoms. Nevertheless, the occurrence of some severe adverse effects and the increasing popularity of PFS require continuous active surveillance, and further research is warranted.

Adverse effects of plant food supplements and plants consumed as food: results from the poisons centres-based PlantLIBRA Study / S. Lüde, S. Vecchio, S. Sinno-Tellier, A. Dopter, H. Mustonen, S. Vucinic, B. Jonsson, D. Müller, L. Veras Gimenez Fruchtengarten, K. Hruby, E. De Souza Nascimento, C. Di Lorenzo, P. Restani, H. Kupferschmidt, A. Ceschi. - In: PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH. - ISSN 0951-418X. - 30:6(2016), pp. 988-996.

Adverse effects of plant food supplements and plants consumed as food: results from the poisons centres-based PlantLIBRA Study

C. Di Lorenzo;P. Restani;
2016

Abstract

Plant food supplements (PFS) are products of increasing popularity and wide-spread distribution. Nevertheless, information about their risks is limited. To fill this gap, a poisons centres-based study was performed as part of the EU project PlantLIBRA. Multicentre retrospective review of data from selected European and Brazilian poisons centres, involving human cases of adverse effects due to plants consumed as food or as ingredients of food supplements recorded between 2006 and 2010. Ten poisons centres provided a total of 75 cases. In 57 cases (76%) a PFS was involved; in 18 (24%) a plant was ingested as food. The 10 most frequently reported plants were Valeriana officinalis, Camellia sinensis, Paullinia cupana, Melissa officinalis, Passiflora incarnata, Mentha piperita, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Ilex paraguariensis, Panax ginseng, and Citrus aurantium. The most frequently observed clinical effects were neurotoxicity and gastro-intestinal symptoms. Most cases showed a benign clinical course; however, five cases were severe. PFS-related adverse effects seem to be relatively infrequent issues for poisons centres. Most cases showed mild symptoms. Nevertheless, the occurrence of some severe adverse effects and the increasing popularity of PFS require continuous active surveillance, and further research is warranted.
adverse reactions; botanicals; nutritional supplements; plants; poisons centres; toxicity
Settore CHIM/10 - Chimica degli Alimenti
   Plant food supplements: Levels of Intake, Benefit and Risk Assessment
   PLANTLIBRA
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   FP7
   245199
2016
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Revision2_PTR-15-1296_PlantLibra Adverse effects PFS_ZORA.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 131.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
131.79 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
L-de_et_al-2016-Phytotherapy_Research.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 120.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
120.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/371862
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact