In a randomised phase 3 trial, panitumumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis characterises the association of PFS with CRC symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival (OS). CRC symptoms (NCCN/FACT CRC symptom index, FCSI) and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were assessed for 207 panitumumab patients and 184 best supportive care (BSC) patients who had at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment. Patients alive at week 8 were included in the PRO and OS analyses and categorised by their week 8 progression status as follows: no progressive disease (no PD; best response of at least stable disease) vs progressive disease (PD). Standard imputation methods were used to assign missing values. Significantly more patients were progression free at weeks 8-24 with panitumumab vs BSC. After excluding responders, a significant difference in PFS remained favouring panitumumab (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.52-0.77; P<0.0001). At week 8, lack of disease progression was associated with significantly and clinically meaningful lower CRC symptomatology for both treatment groups and higher HRQoL for panitumumab patients only. Overall survival favoured no PD patients vs PD patients alive at week 8. Lack of disease progression was associated with better symptom control, HRQoL, and OS.

Association of progression-free survival with patient-reported outcomes and survival: Results from a randomised phase 3 trial of panitumumab / S. Siena, M. Peeters, E. Van Cutsem, Y. Humblet, P. Conte, E. Bajetta, D. Comandini, G. Bodoky, G. Van Hazel, T. Salek, M. Wolf, G. Devercelli, M. Woolley, R.G. Amado. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER. - ISSN 0007-0920. - 97:11(2007), pp. 1469-1474.

Association of progression-free survival with patient-reported outcomes and survival: Results from a randomised phase 3 trial of panitumumab

S. Siena
;
2007

Abstract

In a randomised phase 3 trial, panitumumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis characterises the association of PFS with CRC symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall survival (OS). CRC symptoms (NCCN/FACT CRC symptom index, FCSI) and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were assessed for 207 panitumumab patients and 184 best supportive care (BSC) patients who had at least one post-baseline patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment. Patients alive at week 8 were included in the PRO and OS analyses and categorised by their week 8 progression status as follows: no progressive disease (no PD; best response of at least stable disease) vs progressive disease (PD). Standard imputation methods were used to assign missing values. Significantly more patients were progression free at weeks 8-24 with panitumumab vs BSC. After excluding responders, a significant difference in PFS remained favouring panitumumab (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.52-0.77; P<0.0001). At week 8, lack of disease progression was associated with significantly and clinically meaningful lower CRC symptomatology for both treatment groups and higher HRQoL for panitumumab patients only. Overall survival favoured no PD patients vs PD patients alive at week 8. Lack of disease progression was associated with better symptom control, HRQoL, and OS.
panitumumab; patient-reported outcomes; quality of life; disease progression; symptom; improvement
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
2007
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2007 Siena et al Br J Cancer.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 176.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
176.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/349706
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 68
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 67
social impact