This essay focuses on George H. Mead’s analysis of consciousness. Mead, father of the social psychology and outstanding pragmatist thinker, particularly investigated the social origin of consciousness and conceived the latter, in a Darwinian way, as an outcome of communication process. In his opinion, that process begins with a “conversation of gestures.” It is the gesture (first of all the vocal gesture) that enables the reciprocal adjustments between different individual organisms. Moreover, gestures are pure responses, and there is no need to postulate the existence of states of consciousness acting beyond and before the expressive gestures (as Wundt or Darwin stated). The crucial datum in psychology is the act, not the individual trait, and the act is a complex ‘organic’ process, socially rooted. The act is never exerted singularly, but demands a shared and publicly recognized practice. From the idea of “taking the role of the other” to the Generalized Other and the notion of Game, I shall follow Mead’s account of consciousness and discuss his radical reconstruction of this important topic of contemporary philosophy.

Gesture, Act, Consciousness : The Social Interpretation of the Self in George Herbert Mead / R. Fabbrichesi. - In: PHILOSOPHICAL READINGS. - ISSN 2036-4989. - 7:2(2015 Oct), pp. 98-118.

Gesture, Act, Consciousness : The Social Interpretation of the Self in George Herbert Mead

R. Fabbrichesi
2015

Abstract

This essay focuses on George H. Mead’s analysis of consciousness. Mead, father of the social psychology and outstanding pragmatist thinker, particularly investigated the social origin of consciousness and conceived the latter, in a Darwinian way, as an outcome of communication process. In his opinion, that process begins with a “conversation of gestures.” It is the gesture (first of all the vocal gesture) that enables the reciprocal adjustments between different individual organisms. Moreover, gestures are pure responses, and there is no need to postulate the existence of states of consciousness acting beyond and before the expressive gestures (as Wundt or Darwin stated). The crucial datum in psychology is the act, not the individual trait, and the act is a complex ‘organic’ process, socially rooted. The act is never exerted singularly, but demands a shared and publicly recognized practice. From the idea of “taking the role of the other” to the Generalized Other and the notion of Game, I shall follow Mead’s account of consciousness and discuss his radical reconstruction of this important topic of contemporary philosophy.
Social psychology; Consciousness; Pragmatism
Settore M-FIL/01 - Filosofia Teoretica
ott-2015
https://philosophicalreadings.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/pr22015.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mead per Gori-1_REVISED.docx

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 62.27 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
62.27 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/331199
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact