Recent crises in the financial industry have shown weaknesses in the modeling of Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs). Relatively minor model changes may lead to substantial changes in the RWA numbers. Similar problems are encountered in the Value-at-Risk (VaR)-aggregation of risks. In this article, we highlight some of the underlying issues, both methodologically, as well as through examples. In particular, we frame this discussion in the context of two recent regulatory documents we refer to as Basel 3.5.
An Academic Response to Basel 3.5 / P. Embrechts, G. Puccetti, L. Rüschendorf, R. Wang, A. Beleraj. - In: RISKS. - ISSN 2227-9091. - 2:1(2014), pp. 25-48. [10.3390/risks2010025]
An Academic Response to Basel 3.5
G. Puccetti;
2014
Abstract
Recent crises in the financial industry have shown weaknesses in the modeling of Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs). Relatively minor model changes may lead to substantial changes in the RWA numbers. Similar problems are encountered in the Value-at-Risk (VaR)-aggregation of risks. In this article, we highlight some of the underlying issues, both methodologically, as well as through examples. In particular, we frame this discussion in the context of two recent regulatory documents we refer to as Basel 3.5.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
risks-02-00025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
318.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
318.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
