Background: Since 1985, we introduced a modified combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PEI) as second-line therapy of adult male germ cell tumors with the aim to reduce toxic effect while maintaining efficacy over the original regimen. Patients and Methods: Patients received four cycles of ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2 on days 1-2, etoposide, and cisplatin at 100 and 33 mg/m2, respectively, on days 3-5 every 21 days, followed by surgery. Results were stratified according to the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification Group-2 (IGCCCG-2). Results: From February 1985 to January 2012, 189 patients were treated. 72.6% were IGCCCG-2 intermediate-to-very high risk. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) had a complete response, 67 (35.4%) a marker normalization (PRm-). Median follow-up was 122.1 months (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 71.4-232.0). Two-year progression-free and 5-year overall survival were 34.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 28.1% to 41.9%] and 42.1% (95% CI 35.3% to 50.2%), respectively. Survival estimates compared favorably with those obtained by conventional dose chemotherapy (CDCT) regimens in each prognostic category. 70.4% of grade 3-4 neutropenia (25.5% febrile neutropenia), 48.1% thrombocytopenia, 21.2% anemia, 3.2% neurotoxic effect, and no severe renal toxic effect were recorded. Conclusion: Dose-modified Italian PEI should be considered as an appropriate benchmark for CDCT in the first salvage setting.

Modified cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (PEI) salvage therapy for male germ cell tumors: long-term efficacy and safety outcomes / A. Necchi, N. Nicolai, L. Mariani, D. Raggi, E. Farè, P. Giannatempo, M. Catanzaro, D. Biasoni, T. Torelli, S. Stagni, A. Milani, L. Piva, G. Pizzocaro, A.M. Gianni, R. Salvioni. - In: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0923-7534. - 24:11(2013 Nov), pp. mdt271.2887-mdt271.2892. [10.1093/annonc/mdt271]

Modified cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (PEI) salvage therapy for male germ cell tumors: long-term efficacy and safety outcomes

A. Necchi;D. Raggi;E. Farè;P. Giannatempo;A.M. Gianni;
2013

Abstract

Background: Since 1985, we introduced a modified combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PEI) as second-line therapy of adult male germ cell tumors with the aim to reduce toxic effect while maintaining efficacy over the original regimen. Patients and Methods: Patients received four cycles of ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2 on days 1-2, etoposide, and cisplatin at 100 and 33 mg/m2, respectively, on days 3-5 every 21 days, followed by surgery. Results were stratified according to the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification Group-2 (IGCCCG-2). Results: From February 1985 to January 2012, 189 patients were treated. 72.6% were IGCCCG-2 intermediate-to-very high risk. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) had a complete response, 67 (35.4%) a marker normalization (PRm-). Median follow-up was 122.1 months (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 71.4-232.0). Two-year progression-free and 5-year overall survival were 34.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 28.1% to 41.9%] and 42.1% (95% CI 35.3% to 50.2%), respectively. Survival estimates compared favorably with those obtained by conventional dose chemotherapy (CDCT) regimens in each prognostic category. 70.4% of grade 3-4 neutropenia (25.5% febrile neutropenia), 48.1% thrombocytopenia, 21.2% anemia, 3.2% neurotoxic effect, and no severe renal toxic effect were recorded. Conclusion: Dose-modified Italian PEI should be considered as an appropriate benchmark for CDCT in the first salvage setting.
Combination chemotherapy; Salvage therapies; Testicular neoplasms
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
nov-2013
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ann Oncol-2013-Necchi-2887-92.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 195.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
195.12 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/288878
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact