Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) provides the unique opportunity to assess response to treatment after months rather than years of follow-up. However, significant variability exists in methods of pathologic assessment of response to NAST, and thus its interpretation for subsequent clinical decisions. Our international multidisciplinary working group was convened by the Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration and tasked to recommend practical methods for standardized evaluation of the post-NAST surgical breast cancer specimen for clinical trials that promote accurate and reliable designation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and meaningful characterization of residual disease. Recommendations include multidisciplinary communication; clinical marking of the tumor site (clips); and radiologic, photographic, or pictorial imaging of the sliced specimen, to map the tissue sections and reconcile macroscopic and microscopic findings. The information required to define pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 or ypT0 yp N0), residual ypT and ypN stage using the current AJCC/UICC system, and the Residual Cancer Burden system were recommended for quantification of residual disease in clinical trials.

Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration / V. Bossuyt, E. Provenzano, W.F. Symmans, J.C. Boughey, C. Coles, G. Curigliano, J.M. Dixon, L.J. Esserman, G. Fastner, T. Kuehn, F. Peintinger, G. von Minckwitz, J. White, W. Yang, S. Badve, C. Denkert, G. Macgrogan, F. Penault-Llorca, G. Viale, D. Cameron. - In: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0923-7534. - 26:7(2015 Jul), pp. 1280-1291. [10.1093/annonc/mdv161]

Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration

G. Curigliano;G. Viale
Penultimo
;
2015

Abstract

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) provides the unique opportunity to assess response to treatment after months rather than years of follow-up. However, significant variability exists in methods of pathologic assessment of response to NAST, and thus its interpretation for subsequent clinical decisions. Our international multidisciplinary working group was convened by the Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration and tasked to recommend practical methods for standardized evaluation of the post-NAST surgical breast cancer specimen for clinical trials that promote accurate and reliable designation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and meaningful characterization of residual disease. Recommendations include multidisciplinary communication; clinical marking of the tumor site (clips); and radiologic, photographic, or pictorial imaging of the sliced specimen, to map the tissue sections and reconcile macroscopic and microscopic findings. The information required to define pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 or ypT0 yp N0), residual ypT and ypN stage using the current AJCC/UICC system, and the Residual Cancer Burden system were recommended for quantification of residual disease in clinical trials.
breast cancer; neoadjuvant systemic therapy; pathologic assessment; pathologic complete response; residual disease; response evaluation
Settore MED/08 - Anatomia Patologica
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
lug-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ann Oncol-2015-Bossuyt-1280-91.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.05 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/287337
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 51
  • Scopus 172
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 147
social impact