Hypogravity challenges bipedal locomotion in its common forms. However, as previously theoretically and empirically suggested, humans can rely on “skipping,” a less common gait available as a functional analog (perhaps a vestigium) of quadrupedal gallop, to confidently move when gravity is much lower than on Earth. We set up a 17-m-tall cavaedium (skylight shaft) with a bungee rubber body-suspension system and a treadmill to investigate the metabolic cost and the biomechanics of low-gravity (Mars, Moon) locomotion. Although skipping is never more metabolically economical than running, the difference becomes marginal at lunar gravities, with both bouncing gaits approaching values of walking on Earth (cost 2 J·kg-1 ·m-1 ). Non metabolic factors may thus be allowed to dominate the choice of skipping on the Moon. On the basis of center of pressure measurements and body segments kinetics, we can speculate that these factors may include a further reduction of mechanical work to move the limbs when wearing space suits and a more effective motor control during the ground (regoliths)-boot interaction.

Skipping vs. running as the bipedal gait of choice in hypogravity / G. Pavei, C.M. Biancardi, A.E. Minetti. - In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 8750-7587. - 119:1(2015 Jul 01), pp. 93-100. [10.1152/japplphysiol.01021.2014]

Skipping vs. running as the bipedal gait of choice in hypogravity

G. Pavei
Primo
;
C.M. Biancardi
Secondo
;
A.E. Minetti
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Hypogravity challenges bipedal locomotion in its common forms. However, as previously theoretically and empirically suggested, humans can rely on “skipping,” a less common gait available as a functional analog (perhaps a vestigium) of quadrupedal gallop, to confidently move when gravity is much lower than on Earth. We set up a 17-m-tall cavaedium (skylight shaft) with a bungee rubber body-suspension system and a treadmill to investigate the metabolic cost and the biomechanics of low-gravity (Mars, Moon) locomotion. Although skipping is never more metabolically economical than running, the difference becomes marginal at lunar gravities, with both bouncing gaits approaching values of walking on Earth (cost 2 J·kg-1 ·m-1 ). Non metabolic factors may thus be allowed to dominate the choice of skipping on the Moon. On the basis of center of pressure measurements and body segments kinetics, we can speculate that these factors may include a further reduction of mechanical work to move the limbs when wearing space suits and a more effective motor control during the ground (regoliths)-boot interaction.
Cost of transport; Efficiency; Locomotion; Low gravity; Work
Settore BIO/09 - Fisiologia
1-lug-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
93.full.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.55 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/286965
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 21
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact