Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) have not been established for the Mucorales and any antifungal agent. In lieu of CBPs, epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) are proposed for amphotericin B, posaconazole and itraconazole and four Mucorales species. Wild type (WT) MIC distributions (organisms in a species/drug combination with no detectable acquired resistance mechanisms) were defined with available pooled CLSI MICs from 14 laboratories (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Europe, India, Mexico, and the United States) as follows: 10 Apophysomyces variabilis, 32 Cunninghamella bertholletiae, 136 Lichtheimia corymbifera, 10 Mucor indicus, 123 M. circinelloides, 19 M. ramosissimus, 349 Rhizopus arrhizus, 146 R. microsporus, 33 Rhizomucor pusillus, and 36 Syncephalastrum racemosum. CLSI broth microdilution MICs were aggregated for the analyses. ECVs comprising ≥95% and ≥97.5% of the modeled populations were as follows: amphotericin B ECVs for L. corymbifera were 1 and 2 μg/ml, for M. circinelloides 1 and 2 μg/ml, for R. arrhizus 2 and 4 μg/ml, and for R. microsporus 2 and 2 μg/ml, respectively; posaconazole ECVs for L. corymbifera were 1 and 2, for M. circinelloides 4 and 4, for R. arrhizus 1 and 2, and for R. microsporus 1 and 2, respectively; both itraconazole ECVs for R. arrhizus were 2 μg/ml. ECVs may aid in detecting emerging resistance or those isolates with reduced susceptibility (non-WT-MICs) to the agents evaluated.

A multicenter evaluation of MIC distributions for ECV definition to detect amphotericin B, posaconazole and itraconazole resistance among the most clinically relevant species of Mucorales / A. Espinel-Ingroff, A. Chakrabarti, A. Chowdhary, S. Cordoba, E. Dannaoui, P. Dufresne, A. Fothergill, M. Ghannoum, G.M. Gonzalez, J. Guarro, S. Kidd, C. Lass-Flörl, J.F. Meis, T. Pelaez, A.M. Tortorano, J. Turnidge. - In: ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0066-4804. - 59:3(2015 Mar), pp. 1745-1750. [10.1128/AAC.04435-14]

A multicenter evaluation of MIC distributions for ECV definition to detect amphotericin B, posaconazole and itraconazole resistance among the most clinically relevant species of Mucorales

A.M. Tortorano
Penultimo
;
2015

Abstract

Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) have not been established for the Mucorales and any antifungal agent. In lieu of CBPs, epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) are proposed for amphotericin B, posaconazole and itraconazole and four Mucorales species. Wild type (WT) MIC distributions (organisms in a species/drug combination with no detectable acquired resistance mechanisms) were defined with available pooled CLSI MICs from 14 laboratories (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Europe, India, Mexico, and the United States) as follows: 10 Apophysomyces variabilis, 32 Cunninghamella bertholletiae, 136 Lichtheimia corymbifera, 10 Mucor indicus, 123 M. circinelloides, 19 M. ramosissimus, 349 Rhizopus arrhizus, 146 R. microsporus, 33 Rhizomucor pusillus, and 36 Syncephalastrum racemosum. CLSI broth microdilution MICs were aggregated for the analyses. ECVs comprising ≥95% and ≥97.5% of the modeled populations were as follows: amphotericin B ECVs for L. corymbifera were 1 and 2 μg/ml, for M. circinelloides 1 and 2 μg/ml, for R. arrhizus 2 and 4 μg/ml, and for R. microsporus 2 and 2 μg/ml, respectively; posaconazole ECVs for L. corymbifera were 1 and 2, for M. circinelloides 4 and 4, for R. arrhizus 1 and 2, and for R. microsporus 1 and 2, respectively; both itraconazole ECVs for R. arrhizus were 2 μg/ml. ECVs may aid in detecting emerging resistance or those isolates with reduced susceptibility (non-WT-MICs) to the agents evaluated.
Settore MED/07 - Microbiologia e Microbiologia Clinica
Settore MED/17 - Malattie Infettive
mar-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/263851
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 44
  • Scopus 92
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 84
social impact