Background: Despite the increasing number of antiretroviral compounds, the number of useful drug regimens is limited owing to the high frequency of cross-resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied in vitro two-drug combinations using three protease inhibitors (PIs), tipranavir, amprenavir and lopinavir, on isolates (003 and 004) derived from patients with resistance to multiple PIs compared with the drug-susceptible isolate 14aPre in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Drug interactions were determined by median dose-effect analysis, with the combination index calculated at several inhibitory concentrations (IC). RESULTS: In 14aPre experiments, the combination tipranavir + lopinavir demonstrated synergy at low concentrations (IC(50)), an additive effect at IC(75) and antagonism at IC(90)-IC(95); tipranavir + amprenavir were antagonistic at all concentrations except IC(95), where they were synergic; and the lopinavir + amprenavir combination was always antagonistic. In 003 and 004 infections, tipranavir + lopinavir and tipranavir + amprenavir combinations were antagonistic, and lopinavir + amprenavir were synergic, at all concentrations, with the exception of being additive at IC(95). CONCLUSIONS: Our in vitro experiments did not show any advantage in combining second generation PIs as a therapeutic strategy in naive or multi-treatment failure subjects, with the exception of tipranavir + amprenavir at IC(95) in infections by a wild-type isolate.

Analysis of protease inhibitor combinations in vitro : activity of lopinavir, amprenavir and tipranavir against HIV type 1 wild-type and drug-resistant isolates / E. Bulgheroni, P. Citterio, F. Croce, M. Lo Cicero, O. Viganò, F. Soster, T.C. Chou, M. Galli, S. Rusconi. - In: JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0305-7453. - 53:3(2004 Mar), pp. 464-468. [10.1093/jac/dkh103]

Analysis of protease inhibitor combinations in vitro : activity of lopinavir, amprenavir and tipranavir against HIV type 1 wild-type and drug-resistant isolates

E. Bulgheroni
Primo
;
P. Citterio
Secondo
;
F. Croce;M. Lo Cicero;O. Viganò;M. Galli
Penultimo
;
S. Rusconi
Ultimo
2004

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing number of antiretroviral compounds, the number of useful drug regimens is limited owing to the high frequency of cross-resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied in vitro two-drug combinations using three protease inhibitors (PIs), tipranavir, amprenavir and lopinavir, on isolates (003 and 004) derived from patients with resistance to multiple PIs compared with the drug-susceptible isolate 14aPre in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Drug interactions were determined by median dose-effect analysis, with the combination index calculated at several inhibitory concentrations (IC). RESULTS: In 14aPre experiments, the combination tipranavir + lopinavir demonstrated synergy at low concentrations (IC(50)), an additive effect at IC(75) and antagonism at IC(90)-IC(95); tipranavir + amprenavir were antagonistic at all concentrations except IC(95), where they were synergic; and the lopinavir + amprenavir combination was always antagonistic. In 003 and 004 infections, tipranavir + lopinavir and tipranavir + amprenavir combinations were antagonistic, and lopinavir + amprenavir were synergic, at all concentrations, with the exception of being additive at IC(95). CONCLUSIONS: Our in vitro experiments did not show any advantage in combining second generation PIs as a therapeutic strategy in naive or multi-treatment failure subjects, with the exception of tipranavir + amprenavir at IC(95) in infections by a wild-type isolate.
Combination index; Drug resistance; HIV-1; In vitro combinations; Protease inhibitors
Settore MED/17 - Malattie Infettive
mar-2004
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/26162
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact