Objective: To analyze the costs of treating critically ill patients. Design and setting: Multicenter, observational, prospective, cohort, bottom-up study on variable costs in 51 ICUs. Patients and participants: A total of 1,034 patients aged over 14 years who either spent less than 48 h in the ICU or had multiple trauma, major abdominal surgery, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac failure, isolated head injury, acute lung injury/adult respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS), nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage or coronary surgery. Interventions: Data recorded for each patient: length of ICU stay, and cost in euros of all diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, drugs and equipment used, and consultations by physicians from other units. To express cost-efficiency we calculated for each diagnostic group the cost per surviving patient (expenditure for all patients/number of surviving patients) and money loss per patient (expenditure for patients who died/total number of patients). Measurements and results: Median costs for a multiple trauma patient were €4076 and for coronary surgery patient €380. The variability is largely due to different lengths of ICU stay. Cost per surviving patient was higher for ALI/ARDS, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, multiple trauma, and emergency abdominal surgery. Money loss per patient was higher for ALI/ARDS and lower for multiple trauma. Planned coronary and major abdominal surgery and short-stay patients were treated most cost-efficiently. Conclusions: Cost of treatment in an ICU varies widely for different types of patients. Strategies are needed to contain the major determinants of high costs and low cost-efficiency.

Variable costs of ICU patients: a multicenter prospective study / C. Rossi, B. Simini, L. Brazzi, G. Rossi, D. Radrizzani, G. Iapichino, G. Bertolini. - In: INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0342-4642. - 32:4(2006), pp. 545-552.

Variable costs of ICU patients: a multicenter prospective study

L. Brazzi;G. Iapichino
Penultimo
;
2006

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the costs of treating critically ill patients. Design and setting: Multicenter, observational, prospective, cohort, bottom-up study on variable costs in 51 ICUs. Patients and participants: A total of 1,034 patients aged over 14 years who either spent less than 48 h in the ICU or had multiple trauma, major abdominal surgery, ischemic stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac failure, isolated head injury, acute lung injury/adult respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS), nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage or coronary surgery. Interventions: Data recorded for each patient: length of ICU stay, and cost in euros of all diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, drugs and equipment used, and consultations by physicians from other units. To express cost-efficiency we calculated for each diagnostic group the cost per surviving patient (expenditure for all patients/number of surviving patients) and money loss per patient (expenditure for patients who died/total number of patients). Measurements and results: Median costs for a multiple trauma patient were €4076 and for coronary surgery patient €380. The variability is largely due to different lengths of ICU stay. Cost per surviving patient was higher for ALI/ARDS, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, multiple trauma, and emergency abdominal surgery. Money loss per patient was higher for ALI/ARDS and lower for multiple trauma. Planned coronary and major abdominal surgery and short-stay patients were treated most cost-efficiently. Conclusions: Cost of treatment in an ICU varies widely for different types of patients. Strategies are needed to contain the major determinants of high costs and low cost-efficiency.
Settore MED/41 - Anestesiologia
2006
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/24312
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 21
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact