We read with interest the article by Kent and colleagues about sublobar resection efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer. It is intended to verify that locoregional recurrence is lower after segmentectomy than after wedge resection. The authors used the population of the ACOSG Z4032 trial to compare these techniques concerning operative approach (open or video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS]), margin, and lymph node yield.
Sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer : what really affects the outcome? / A. Baisi, F. Raveglia, M. De Simone, U. Cioffi. - In: ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY. - ISSN 0003-4975. - 98:1(2014 Jul), pp. 387-388. [10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.038]
Sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer : what really affects the outcome?
A. Baisi;F. Raveglia;M. De Simone;U. Cioffi
2014
Abstract
We read with interest the article by Kent and colleagues about sublobar resection efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer. It is intended to verify that locoregional recurrence is lower after segmentectomy than after wedge resection. The authors used the population of the ACOSG Z4032 trial to compare these techniques concerning operative approach (open or video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS]), margin, and lymph node yield.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0003497514003130-main.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
330.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
330.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
