In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI ) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC ) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI ? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI 's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI -act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged.
The "Ought'' Implies "Can'' Principle : A Challenge to Collective Intentionality / G. Feis. - In: PHENOMENOLOGY AND MIND. - ISSN 2280-7853. - 2:(2012), pp. 114-121.
The "Ought'' Implies "Can'' Principle : A Challenge to Collective Intentionality
G. Feis
2012
Abstract
In my paper I investigate collective intentionality (CI ) through the “Ought” implies “Can” (OIC ) principle. My leading question is does OIC impose any further requirement on CI ? In answering the challenge inside a Searlean framework, I realize that we need to clarify what CI 's structure is and what kind of role the agents joining a CI -act have. In the last part of the paper, I put forward an (inverted) Hartian framework to allow the Searlean CI theory to be agent sensitive and cope with the problems that emerged.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.