The aim of this study was to evaluate the physico-chemical properties and the in vivo host response of a surface sandblasted with particles of titanium oxide (TiO2) followed by acid etching as an alternative to aluminium oxide. Thirty titanium disks manufactured in the same conditions as the implants and 24 conventional cylindrical implants were used., Half of the implants had a machined surface (Gcon) while in the other half the surface was treated by with particles of TiO2 followed by acid etching (Gexp). Surface characterization was assessed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDS), profilometry, and wettability. For the in vivo test, 12 implants of each group were implanted in the tibia of 6 rabbits, and were reverse torque tested after periods of 30 or 60 days after implantation. Following torque, SEM was utilized to assess residual bone-implant contact. The surface characterization by SEM showed a very homogeneous surface with uniform irregularities for Gexp and a small amount of residues of the blasting procedure, while Gcon presented a surface with minimal irregularities from the machining tools. Wettability test showed decreased contact angle for the Gcon relative to the Gexp. The Gexp removal torque at 30 and 60 days was 28.7%, and 33.2% higher relative to the Gcon, respectively. Blasting the surface with particles of TiO2 represents an adequate option for the surface treatment of dental implants, with minimal risk of contamination by the residual debris from the blasting procedure.

The positive biomechanical effects of titanium oxide for sandblasting implant surface as an alternative to aluminium oxide / S.A. Gehrke, S. Taschieri, M. Del Fabbro, P. Coelho. - In: JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY. - ISSN 0160-6972. - (2013 Sep 03). [Epub ahead of print]

The positive biomechanical effects of titanium oxide for sandblasting implant surface as an alternative to aluminium oxide

S. Taschieri
Secondo
;
M. Del Fabbro
Penultimo
;
2013

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the physico-chemical properties and the in vivo host response of a surface sandblasted with particles of titanium oxide (TiO2) followed by acid etching as an alternative to aluminium oxide. Thirty titanium disks manufactured in the same conditions as the implants and 24 conventional cylindrical implants were used., Half of the implants had a machined surface (Gcon) while in the other half the surface was treated by with particles of TiO2 followed by acid etching (Gexp). Surface characterization was assessed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry (EDS), profilometry, and wettability. For the in vivo test, 12 implants of each group were implanted in the tibia of 6 rabbits, and were reverse torque tested after periods of 30 or 60 days after implantation. Following torque, SEM was utilized to assess residual bone-implant contact. The surface characterization by SEM showed a very homogeneous surface with uniform irregularities for Gexp and a small amount of residues of the blasting procedure, while Gcon presented a surface with minimal irregularities from the machining tools. Wettability test showed decreased contact angle for the Gcon relative to the Gexp. The Gexp removal torque at 30 and 60 days was 28.7%, and 33.2% higher relative to the Gcon, respectively. Blasting the surface with particles of TiO2 represents an adequate option for the surface treatment of dental implants, with minimal risk of contamination by the residual debris from the blasting procedure.
Dental Implants ; surface treatment ; alumina ; titanium micro particles; implant contamination
Settore MED/28 - Malattie Odontostomatologiche
3-set-2013
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/224852
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact