Objective: The incidence of perioperative complications during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is reported in limited series. The aim of this study is to evaluate a multi-center survey of unexpected intraprocedural critical events of EVAR. Methods: A questionnaire relative to intraprocedural complications during EVAR was sent to major vascular surgery divisions in Italy. Eleven answered to the survey. The data obtained are relative to 1696 procedures. Results: A wide range of incidence of critical events was observed, from a lower value of 2.7% to a higher value of 68.8% (mean 21.16%). The problems relative to the insertion phase of the delivery system were 7.7%. Endoleaks were reported in 5.5% of cases. Stent graft release was problematic in 0.4% of cases and in another 0.4% there was a problem in shaft retrieval. Unintentional coverage of renal or polar arteries occurred in 0.8% of the procedures; hypogastric arteries were unwillingly excluded in 2.7% of cases. Aortic or iliac artery rupture had an incidence of 0.7%; arterial dissection occurred in 0.9%, atheroembolism in 0.5%, lower limb ischemia due to graft limb kinks in 0.7% and to occlusion in 0.9%. Conclusions: Perioperative critical events represent a serious problem only in few cases of EVAR; they are common but in many cases not predictable; in most circumstances they can be easily corrected with adjunctive manoeuvres during the same procedure. There is a highly significant correlation between the total workload and the incidence of critical events ; these do not appear to be related to the learning curve.

Early complications in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm / L. Gabrielli, A. Baudo, A. Molinari, M. Domanin. - In: ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA. - ISSN 0001-5458. - 104:5(2004), pp. 519-526.

Early complications in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

L. Gabrielli;M. Domanin
2004

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of perioperative complications during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is reported in limited series. The aim of this study is to evaluate a multi-center survey of unexpected intraprocedural critical events of EVAR. Methods: A questionnaire relative to intraprocedural complications during EVAR was sent to major vascular surgery divisions in Italy. Eleven answered to the survey. The data obtained are relative to 1696 procedures. Results: A wide range of incidence of critical events was observed, from a lower value of 2.7% to a higher value of 68.8% (mean 21.16%). The problems relative to the insertion phase of the delivery system were 7.7%. Endoleaks were reported in 5.5% of cases. Stent graft release was problematic in 0.4% of cases and in another 0.4% there was a problem in shaft retrieval. Unintentional coverage of renal or polar arteries occurred in 0.8% of the procedures; hypogastric arteries were unwillingly excluded in 2.7% of cases. Aortic or iliac artery rupture had an incidence of 0.7%; arterial dissection occurred in 0.9%, atheroembolism in 0.5%, lower limb ischemia due to graft limb kinks in 0.7% and to occlusion in 0.9%. Conclusions: Perioperative critical events represent a serious problem only in few cases of EVAR; they are common but in many cases not predictable; in most circumstances they can be easily corrected with adjunctive manoeuvres during the same procedure. There is a highly significant correlation between the total workload and the incidence of critical events ; these do not appear to be related to the learning curve.
Settore MED/22 - Chirurgia Vascolare
2004
http://www.belsurg.org/uploaded_pdfs/104/104_519_526.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ACTA CHIR BELGICA.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 143.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
143.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/21853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact