When evaluating models, various indices or test statistics are computed, quantifying the magnitude of model residuals, the correlation between estimates and measurements, patterns of residuals over external variables, etc. Such indices are variously related to each other, thus making model comparison difficult. Problems of this type emerge when testing solar radiation models. This paper proposes a fuzzy expert system to calculate a modular indicator, I-rad, which reflects an expert perception about the quality of the performance of solar radiation models. Three modules were formulated reflecting the magnitude of residuals (Accuracy), the correlation estimates and measurements (Correlation), and the presence or absence of patterns in the residuals against independent variables (Pattern), respectively. The modules Accuracy and Pattern, resulted from the aggregation of three (relative root mean square error, modeling efficiency, and t-Student probability) and two (pattern index vs. day of the year and pattern index vs. minimum air temperature) indices, respectively, while the module Correlation was identified by a single index (Pearson's correlation coefficient). For each index, two functions describing membership to the fuzzy subsets Favorable (F) and Unfavorable (U) have been defined, The expert system calculates the modules according to both the degree of membership of the indices to the subsets F and U and a set of decision rules. Then the modules are aggregated into the indicator I-rad. Sensitivity analysis is presented, along with module and I-rad scores for some application cases.

An indicator of solar radiation model performance based on a fuzzy expert system / G. Bellocchi, M. Acutis, G. Fila, M. Donatelli. - In: AGRONOMY JOURNAL. - ISSN 0002-1962. - 94:6(2002), pp. 1222-1233. [10.2134/agronj2002.1222]

An indicator of solar radiation model performance based on a fuzzy expert system

M. Acutis
Secondo
;
2002

Abstract

When evaluating models, various indices or test statistics are computed, quantifying the magnitude of model residuals, the correlation between estimates and measurements, patterns of residuals over external variables, etc. Such indices are variously related to each other, thus making model comparison difficult. Problems of this type emerge when testing solar radiation models. This paper proposes a fuzzy expert system to calculate a modular indicator, I-rad, which reflects an expert perception about the quality of the performance of solar radiation models. Three modules were formulated reflecting the magnitude of residuals (Accuracy), the correlation estimates and measurements (Correlation), and the presence or absence of patterns in the residuals against independent variables (Pattern), respectively. The modules Accuracy and Pattern, resulted from the aggregation of three (relative root mean square error, modeling efficiency, and t-Student probability) and two (pattern index vs. day of the year and pattern index vs. minimum air temperature) indices, respectively, while the module Correlation was identified by a single index (Pearson's correlation coefficient). For each index, two functions describing membership to the fuzzy subsets Favorable (F) and Unfavorable (U) have been defined, The expert system calculates the modules according to both the degree of membership of the indices to the subsets F and U and a set of decision rules. Then the modules are aggregated into the indicator I-rad. Sensitivity analysis is presented, along with module and I-rad scores for some application cases.
crop nitrogen; simulation; temperature; algorithm
Settore AGR/02 - Agronomia e Coltivazioni Erbacee
2002
2002
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
aj-94-6-1222.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 166.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
166.3 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/424341
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 84
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 75
social impact