Success in competition for limiting parental resources depends on the interplay between parental decisions over allocation of care and offspring traits. Birth order, individual sex and sex of competing siblings are major candidates as determinants of success in sib–sib competition, but experimental studies focusing on the combined effect of these factors on parent–offspring communication and within-brood competitive dynamics are rare. Here, we assessed individual food intake and body mass gain during feeding trials in barn swallow chicks differing for seniority and sex, and compared the intensity of their acoustic and postural solicitation (begging) displays. Begging intensity and success in competition depended on seniority in combination with individual sex and sex of the opponent. Junior chicks begged more than seniors, independently of satiation level (which was also experimentally manipulated), and obtained greater access to food. Females were generally weaker competitors than males. Individual sex and sex of the opponent also affected duration of begging bouts. Present results thus show that competition with siblings can make the rearing environment variably harsh for developing chicks, depending on individual sex, sex of competing broodmates and age ranking within the nest. They also suggest that parental decisions on the allocation of care and response of kin to signalling siblings may further contribute to the outcome of sibling competition.

Birth order, individual sex and sex of competitors determine the outcome of conflict among siblings over parental care / A. Bonisoli-Alquati, G. Boncoraglio, M. Caprioli, N. Saino. - In: PROCEEDINGS - ROYAL SOCIETY. BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0962-8452. - 278:1709(2011 Apr 22), pp. 1273-1279.

Birth order, individual sex and sex of competitors determine the outcome of conflict among siblings over parental care

A. Bonisoli-Alquati
Primo
;
G. Boncoraglio
Secondo
;
M. Caprioli
Penultimo
;
N. Saino
Ultimo
2011

Abstract

Success in competition for limiting parental resources depends on the interplay between parental decisions over allocation of care and offspring traits. Birth order, individual sex and sex of competing siblings are major candidates as determinants of success in sib–sib competition, but experimental studies focusing on the combined effect of these factors on parent–offspring communication and within-brood competitive dynamics are rare. Here, we assessed individual food intake and body mass gain during feeding trials in barn swallow chicks differing for seniority and sex, and compared the intensity of their acoustic and postural solicitation (begging) displays. Begging intensity and success in competition depended on seniority in combination with individual sex and sex of the opponent. Junior chicks begged more than seniors, independently of satiation level (which was also experimentally manipulated), and obtained greater access to food. Females were generally weaker competitors than males. Individual sex and sex of the opponent also affected duration of begging bouts. Present results thus show that competition with siblings can make the rearing environment variably harsh for developing chicks, depending on individual sex, sex of competing broodmates and age ranking within the nest. They also suggest that parental decisions on the allocation of care and response of kin to signalling siblings may further contribute to the outcome of sibling competition.
begging; competitive asymmetry; environmental sensitivity; hatching asynchrony; sexual dimorphism; sibling competition
Settore BIO/07 - Ecologia
Settore BIO/05 - Zoologia
22-apr-2011
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1273.full.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 237.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
237.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/154281
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact