Background: Stage IV rectal cancer occurs in 25% of patients and locoregional control of primary tumor is usually poorly considered, since priority is the treatment of metastatic disease. Aims: This study evaluates impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCHRTS) vs. upfront surgery on locoregional control and overall survival in stage IV rectal cancer. Methods: All patients diagnosed with stage IV rectal carcinoma between 2009 and 2019, undergone elective surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Italy), were included. Propensity score-based matching was performed between the two study groups. Loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meyer method. Results: A total of 139 patients were analyzed. After propensity score matching, 88 patients were included in the final analysis. The 3-yr LRRFS rates were 80.3% for nCHRTS vs. 90.4% for upfront surgery patients (p = 0.35). The 3-yr OS rates were respectively 81.8% vs. 58% (p = 0.36). KRAS mutation (HR 2.506, p = 0.038) and extra-liver metastases (HR 4.308, p = 0.003) were both predictive of worse OS in univariate analysis. Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant impact of nCHRTS on LRRFS or OS in stage IV rectal cancer.

No benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in stage IV rectal cancer : A propensity score-matched analysis on a real-world population / P. Milito, L. Sorrentino, F. Pietrantonio, A. Di Russo, D. Citterio, V. Mazzaferro, M. Cosimelli. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 53:8(2021 Aug), pp. 1041-1047. [10.1016/j.dld.2021.01.013]

No benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in stage IV rectal cancer : A propensity score-matched analysis on a real-world population

P. Milito;F. Pietrantonio;V. Mazzaferro;
2021

Abstract

Background: Stage IV rectal cancer occurs in 25% of patients and locoregional control of primary tumor is usually poorly considered, since priority is the treatment of metastatic disease. Aims: This study evaluates impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCHRTS) vs. upfront surgery on locoregional control and overall survival in stage IV rectal cancer. Methods: All patients diagnosed with stage IV rectal carcinoma between 2009 and 2019, undergone elective surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Italy), were included. Propensity score-based matching was performed between the two study groups. Loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meyer method. Results: A total of 139 patients were analyzed. After propensity score matching, 88 patients were included in the final analysis. The 3-yr LRRFS rates were 80.3% for nCHRTS vs. 90.4% for upfront surgery patients (p = 0.35). The 3-yr OS rates were respectively 81.8% vs. 58% (p = 0.36). KRAS mutation (HR 2.506, p = 0.038) and extra-liver metastases (HR 4.308, p = 0.003) were both predictive of worse OS in univariate analysis. Conclusion: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant impact of nCHRTS on LRRFS or OS in stage IV rectal cancer.
Liver metastases; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation; Rectal cancer; Stage IV
Settore MED/06 - Oncologia Medica
Settore MED/18 - Chirurgia Generale
ago-2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1590865821000190-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 585.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
585.63 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/869197
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact