Relying on Ambrosianus G 69 inf., a philosophical miscellany owned by the celebrated collector Gian Vincenzo Pin elli, this article examines an unpublished disputation about mathematical abstraction. In it, the Dominican theologian Tommaso Pellegrini defends traditional Aristotelian views on subalternate sciences; by contrast, Pompeo da Otranto offers a rebuttal anchored on Odcham's theory of intellectual habits. The reconstruction of this epistemic debate sheds much needed light on various forms of assembling Aristotle within the protocols of Pinelli's scholarship and paperwork.

The Philosophy of Mathematics in Gian Vincenzo Pinelli's Papers / S. Gulizia. - In: BRUNIANA & CAMPANELLIANA. - ISSN 1125-3819. - 25:2(2019 Feb), pp. 459-464.

The Philosophy of Mathematics in Gian Vincenzo Pinelli's Papers

S. Gulizia
2019

Abstract

Relying on Ambrosianus G 69 inf., a philosophical miscellany owned by the celebrated collector Gian Vincenzo Pin elli, this article examines an unpublished disputation about mathematical abstraction. In it, the Dominican theologian Tommaso Pellegrini defends traditional Aristotelian views on subalternate sciences; by contrast, Pompeo da Otranto offers a rebuttal anchored on Odcham's theory of intellectual habits. The reconstruction of this epistemic debate sheds much needed light on various forms of assembling Aristotle within the protocols of Pinelli's scholarship and paperwork.
Gian Vincenzo Pinelli; Aristotelianism; Mathematics; Ambrosian Library
Settore M-STO/05 - Storia della Scienza e delle Tecniche
feb-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gulizia (Bruniana et Campanelliana, 2.2019).pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 650.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
650.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/842962
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact