The landscape of structural variants (SV) in multiple myeloma remains poorly understood. Here, we performed comprehensive analysis of SVs in a large cohort of 752 patients with multiple myeloma by low-coverage long-insert whole-genome sequencing. We identified 68 SV hotspots involving 17 new candidate driver genes, including the therapeutic targets BCMA (TNFRSF17), SLAM7, and MCL1. Catastrophic complex rearrangements termed chromothripsis were present in 24% of patients and independently associated with poor clinical outcomes. Templated insertions were the second most frequent complex event (19%), mostly involved in super-enhancer hijacking and activation of oncogenes such as CCND1 and MYC. Importantly, in 31% of patients, two or more seemingly independent putative driver events were caused by a single structural event, demonstrating that the complex genomic landscape of multiple myeloma can be acquired through few key events during tumor evolutionary history. Overall, this study reveals the critical role of SVs in multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Significance: Previous genomic studies in multiple myeloma have largely focused on single-nucleotide variants, recurrent copy-number alterations, and recurrent translocations. Here, we demonstrate the crucial role of SVs and complex events in the development of multiple myeloma and highlight the importance of whole-genome sequencing to decipher its genomic complexity.

Revealing the Impact of Structural Variants in Multiple Myeloma / E.H. Rustad, V.D. Yellapantula, D. Glodzik, K.H. Maclachlan, B. Diamond, E.M. Boyle, C. Ashby, P. Blaney, G. Gundem, M. Hultcrantz, D. Leongamornlert, N. Angelopoulos, L. Agnelli, D. Auclair, Y. Zhang, A. Dogan, N. Bolli, E. Papaemmanuil, K.C. Anderson, P. Moreau, H. Avet-Loiseau, N.C. Munshi, J.J. Keats, P.J. Campbell, G.J. Morgan, O. Landgren, F. Maura. - In: BLOOD CANCER DISCOVERY. - ISSN 2643-3230. - 1:3(2020 Nov), pp. 258-273. [10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-20-0132]

Revealing the Impact of Structural Variants in Multiple Myeloma

L. Agnelli;N. Bolli;
2020

Abstract

The landscape of structural variants (SV) in multiple myeloma remains poorly understood. Here, we performed comprehensive analysis of SVs in a large cohort of 752 patients with multiple myeloma by low-coverage long-insert whole-genome sequencing. We identified 68 SV hotspots involving 17 new candidate driver genes, including the therapeutic targets BCMA (TNFRSF17), SLAM7, and MCL1. Catastrophic complex rearrangements termed chromothripsis were present in 24% of patients and independently associated with poor clinical outcomes. Templated insertions were the second most frequent complex event (19%), mostly involved in super-enhancer hijacking and activation of oncogenes such as CCND1 and MYC. Importantly, in 31% of patients, two or more seemingly independent putative driver events were caused by a single structural event, demonstrating that the complex genomic landscape of multiple myeloma can be acquired through few key events during tumor evolutionary history. Overall, this study reveals the critical role of SVs in multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Significance: Previous genomic studies in multiple myeloma have largely focused on single-nucleotide variants, recurrent copy-number alterations, and recurrent translocations. Here, we demonstrate the crucial role of SVs and complex events in the development of multiple myeloma and highlight the importance of whole-genome sequencing to decipher its genomic complexity.
Settore MED/15 - Malattie del Sangue
nov-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Rustad et al. - 2020 - Revealing the impact of structural variants in mul.pdf

Open Access dal 02/11/2021

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 1.98 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.98 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/792643
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 69
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 62
social impact