Research question: Is there an association between diet and poor ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in women with normal biomarkers of ovarian reserve? Design: Women eligible for IVF at an Academic Fertility Center were invited to participate in this prospective cross-sectional study. The main inclusion criteria were age 18–39 years, body mass index 18–25 kg/m2, preserved ovarian reserve (antral follicle count 10–22 or anti-Müllerian hormone concentration 2–5 ng/ml) and a starting dose of gonadotrophins of 150–225 IU/day. Information on diet was obtained using a validated food frequency questionnaire. ‘Unexpected poor ovarian response’ was defined as the retrieval of three or fewer suitable oocytes. A logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: Out of the 303 women enrolled in the study, 48 (16%) showed an unexpected poor ovarian response. The frequency of poor responders increased with increasing glycaemic load, carbohydrate intake and fibre intake. When comparing the third with the first tertile (reference), the adjusted odds ratios for these were 3.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–13.83, P = 0.04), 4.78 (95% CI 1.23–18.51, P = 0.02) and 6.03 (95% CI 1.18–30.77, P = 0.07), respectively. Conclusions: Elevated dietary glycaemic load as well as carbohydrate intake and fibre intake is significantly associated with unexpected poor ovarian response. Future interventional studies should clarify whether dietary modification might restore normal response.

The role of diet in unexpected poor response to ovarian stimulation: a cross-sectional study / S.A. Noli, S. Ferrari, E. Ricci, M. Reschini, S. Cipriani, C. Dallagiovanna, F. Parazzini, E. Somigliana. - In: REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE. - ISSN 1472-6483. - 41:5(2020), pp. 874-883. [10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.011]

The role of diet in unexpected poor response to ovarian stimulation: a cross-sectional study

S.A. Noli
;
C. Dallagiovanna;F. Parazzini;E. Somigliana
2020

Abstract

Research question: Is there an association between diet and poor ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in women with normal biomarkers of ovarian reserve? Design: Women eligible for IVF at an Academic Fertility Center were invited to participate in this prospective cross-sectional study. The main inclusion criteria were age 18–39 years, body mass index 18–25 kg/m2, preserved ovarian reserve (antral follicle count 10–22 or anti-Müllerian hormone concentration 2–5 ng/ml) and a starting dose of gonadotrophins of 150–225 IU/day. Information on diet was obtained using a validated food frequency questionnaire. ‘Unexpected poor ovarian response’ was defined as the retrieval of three or fewer suitable oocytes. A logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. Results: Out of the 303 women enrolled in the study, 48 (16%) showed an unexpected poor ovarian response. The frequency of poor responders increased with increasing glycaemic load, carbohydrate intake and fibre intake. When comparing the third with the first tertile (reference), the adjusted odds ratios for these were 3.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–13.83, P = 0.04), 4.78 (95% CI 1.23–18.51, P = 0.02) and 6.03 (95% CI 1.18–30.77, P = 0.07), respectively. Conclusions: Elevated dietary glycaemic load as well as carbohydrate intake and fibre intake is significantly associated with unexpected poor ovarian response. Future interventional studies should clarify whether dietary modification might restore normal response.
Diet; Glycaemic load; IVF; Ovarian response
Settore MED/40 - Ginecologia e Ostetricia
2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1472648320303825-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 625.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
625.39 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/783344
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact