This chapter compares social models in Europe and Latin America. The goal is to study the interaction between two institutions: on the one hand, pre-distributive (ex ante) institutions, such as the structure and coverage of collective bargaining and, on the other hand, post-distributive (ex post) institutions, such as unemployment protection and social policy. Pre-distributive institutions are important for correcting inequalities in the labour market, because they introduce guidelines for egalitarian wage structures. Post-distributive institutions help to mitigate inequalities generated in the labour market. The methodology is based on statistical analysis of a series of indicators related to pre and post-distributive policies. The results present three types of model: 1) coordinated economies, typical of neo-corporatist Scandinavian countries; 2) mixed economies, typical of Mediterranean systems, and 3) uncoordinated economies, which equate to liberalism and the Latin American ‘structural heterogeneity’ model. It is neo-corporatist coordinated economies that generate the most pre and post-distributive equality. In turn, uncoordinated economies, and Latin American ones in particular, generate more inequalities due to highly informal employment and the weakness of their post-distributive institutions.

Social Models for Dealing with Inequalities / A. Martín Artiles, E. Chávez Molina, R. Semenza - In: Towards a Comparative Analysis of Social Inequalities between Europe and Latin America; / [a cura di] P. López Roldán, S. Fachelli. - [s.l] : Springer, 2021. - ISBN 9783030484415. - pp. 35-61 [10.1007/978-3-030-48442-2_2]

Social Models for Dealing with Inequalities

R. Semenza
2021

Abstract

This chapter compares social models in Europe and Latin America. The goal is to study the interaction between two institutions: on the one hand, pre-distributive (ex ante) institutions, such as the structure and coverage of collective bargaining and, on the other hand, post-distributive (ex post) institutions, such as unemployment protection and social policy. Pre-distributive institutions are important for correcting inequalities in the labour market, because they introduce guidelines for egalitarian wage structures. Post-distributive institutions help to mitigate inequalities generated in the labour market. The methodology is based on statistical analysis of a series of indicators related to pre and post-distributive policies. The results present three types of model: 1) coordinated economies, typical of neo-corporatist Scandinavian countries; 2) mixed economies, typical of Mediterranean systems, and 3) uncoordinated economies, which equate to liberalism and the Latin American ‘structural heterogeneity’ model. It is neo-corporatist coordinated economies that generate the most pre and post-distributive equality. In turn, uncoordinated economies, and Latin American ones in particular, generate more inequalities due to highly informal employment and the weakness of their post-distributive institutions.
collective bargaining; centralisation; wage coordination; inequalities; employment; unemployment; informality; segmentation, neo-corporatism
Settore SPS/09 - Sociologia dei Processi economici e del Lavoro
2021
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Springer Chapter 2 Social model.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 658.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
658.78 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Martín-Artiles2021_Chapter_SocialModelsForDealingWithIneq.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.01 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/776015
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact