A slow V̇O2 on-response allows comfortable adoption of aerobically unaffordable walking and running speeds on short stair ascents

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical and metabolic reasons for the spontaneous gait/speed choice when ascending a short flight of stairs, where walking on every step or running on every other step are frequently interchangeable options. The kinematics, oxygen uptake (V̇O2 ), ventilation and heart rate of 24 subjects were sampled during climbing one and two flights of stairs while using the two gaits. Although motor acts were very short in time (5-22 s), metabolic kinetics, extending into the 250 s after the end of climbing, consistently reflected the (metabolic equivalent of the) required mechanical energy and allowed comparison of the two ascent choices: despite a 250% higher mechanical power associated with running, measured [Formula: see text], ventilation and heart rate peaked at only +25% with respect to walking, and in both gaits at much lower values than [Formula: see text] despite predictions based on previous gradient locomotion studies. Mechanical work and metabolic cost of transport, as expected, showed a similar increase (+25%) in running. For stairs up to a height of 4.8 m (30 steps at 53% gradient), running makes us consume slightly more calories than walking, and in both gaits with no discomfort at all. The cardio-respiratory-metabolic responses similarly delay and dampen the replenishment of phosphocreatine stores, which were depleted much faster during the impulsive, highly powered mechanical event, with almost overlapping time courses. This discrepancy between mechanical and metabolic dynamics allows us to afford climbs ranging from almost to very anaerobic, and to interchangeably decide whether to walk or run up a short flight of stairs.