The judgment of 5 May 2020 of the Zweiter Senat of the Bundesverfassungsgericht is manifestly inappropriate from a legal point of view as it expresses the German constitutional judge’s claim to assess the legality of the ECB’s decisions and the correctness of reasoning of the CJEU in Weiss. The judges are using the principle of proportionality to assess the correct application of the principle of conferral in a way that is simply impossible to follow and thus objectively arbitrary. Furthermore, the judges make a very questionable use of the principle of democracy and of economic analysis in assessing the correctness of the ECB’s PSPP program. The judgement is extremely dangerous by ultimately questioning the application of EU law in a Member State and encourages other courts and Member States’ governments to do the same. The judges’ reasoning is the glaring demonstration of a form of “cultural bullying” which particularly emerges in the reasoning carried out on proportionality.

¿Karlsruhe über alles? La insoportable pesadez del juez constitucional alemán (sobre la sentencia del zweiter senat del tribunal constitucional federal alemán del 5 de mayo de 2020 relativa al programa PSPP del banco central europeo) / D.U. Galetta, J. Ziller. - In: CIVITAS. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE DERECHO EUROPEO. - ISSN 1579-6302. - 2020:73-74(2020 Jul 03), pp. 179-212. [10.37417/REDE/num73-74_2020_390]

¿Karlsruhe über alles? La insoportable pesadez del juez constitucional alemán (sobre la sentencia del zweiter senat del tribunal constitucional federal alemán del 5 de mayo de 2020 relativa al programa PSPP del banco central europeo)

D.U. Galetta
Co-primo
;
2020

Abstract

The judgment of 5 May 2020 of the Zweiter Senat of the Bundesverfassungsgericht is manifestly inappropriate from a legal point of view as it expresses the German constitutional judge’s claim to assess the legality of the ECB’s decisions and the correctness of reasoning of the CJEU in Weiss. The judges are using the principle of proportionality to assess the correct application of the principle of conferral in a way that is simply impossible to follow and thus objectively arbitrary. Furthermore, the judges make a very questionable use of the principle of democracy and of economic analysis in assessing the correctness of the ECB’s PSPP program. The judgement is extremely dangerous by ultimately questioning the application of EU law in a Member State and encourages other courts and Member States’ governments to do the same. The judges’ reasoning is the glaring demonstration of a form of “cultural bullying” which particularly emerges in the reasoning carried out on proportionality.
La sentencia del 5 de mayo de 2020 del Zweiter Senat del Bundesverfassungsgericht, es manifiestamente inadecuada del punto de vista jurídico, en la medida en que expresa la pretensión del juez constitucional alemán de evaluar la legalidad de las decisiones del BCE y la corrección argumental del TJUE en Weiss. Los jueces alemanes manejan el principio de proporcionalidad para evaluar la correcta aplicación del principio atribución. Además, los jueces hacen un uso muy cuestionable del principio de democracia y del análisis económico para evaluar la corrección del programa PSPP del BCE. La sentencia es extremadamente peligrosa al cuestionar en última instancia la aplicación del Derecho de la UE en un Estado miembro y alienta a otros tribunales y a los gobiernos de los Estados miembros a hacer lo mismo. El razonamiento de los jueces es la demostración flagrante de una forma de “acosamiento cultural” que aflora especialmente en el razonamiento realizado sobre la proporcionalidad.
Atribución; diálogo judicial; moderación judicial; proporcionalidad
Settore IUS/10 - Diritto Amministrativo
Settore IUS/14 - Diritto dell'Unione Europea
3-lug-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Galetta-ZillerRevista Española de Derecho Europeo06-2020.pdf

Open Access dal 04/07/2021

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 157.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
157.24 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/759025
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact