Using new comparative expert data about the 2016 US Presidential Election, this article explores the effects of experts’ ideological preferences on their evaluations of electoral integrity. Without contesting the claim that the 2016 election faced challenges of integrity, our analyses reveal a substantial association between negative evaluation of election integrity and experts’ ideological orientation. Our results also suggest that this ideological effect is stronger in States that “swinged” from Democratic to Republican in the 2016 election.

The integrity of the 2016 US Presidential Election: Exploring the possible impact of ideology on experts’ judgments / L. Curini. - In: PARTY POLITICS. - ISSN 1354-0688. - 27:1 (Special Issue)(2021), pp. 81-91. [10.1177/1354068818809524]

The integrity of the 2016 US Presidential Election: Exploring the possible impact of ideology on experts’ judgments

L. Curini
2021

Abstract

Using new comparative expert data about the 2016 US Presidential Election, this article explores the effects of experts’ ideological preferences on their evaluations of electoral integrity. Without contesting the claim that the 2016 election faced challenges of integrity, our analyses reveal a substantial association between negative evaluation of election integrity and experts’ ideological orientation. Our results also suggest that this ideological effect is stronger in States that “swinged” from Democratic to Republican in the 2016 election.
expert surveys; electoral integrity; ideological heterogeneity; US 2016 Presidential Election
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
2021
29-mar-2019
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
44 party politics electoral integrity.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 294.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
294.35 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/710261
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact