Using new comparative expert data about the 2016 US Presidential Election, this article explores the effects of experts’ ideological preferences on their evaluations of electoral integrity. Without contesting the claim that the 2016 election faced challenges of integrity, our analyses reveal a substantial association between negative evaluation of election integrity and experts’ ideological orientation. Our results also suggest that this ideological effect is stronger in States that “swinged” from Democratic to Republican in the 2016 election.
The integrity of the 2016 US Presidential Election: Exploring the possible impact of ideology on experts’ judgments / L. Curini. - In: PARTY POLITICS. - ISSN 1354-0688. - 27:1 (Special Issue)(2021), pp. 81-91. [10.1177/1354068818809524]
The integrity of the 2016 US Presidential Election: Exploring the possible impact of ideology on experts’ judgments
L. Curini
2021
Abstract
Using new comparative expert data about the 2016 US Presidential Election, this article explores the effects of experts’ ideological preferences on their evaluations of electoral integrity. Without contesting the claim that the 2016 election faced challenges of integrity, our analyses reveal a substantial association between negative evaluation of election integrity and experts’ ideological orientation. Our results also suggest that this ideological effect is stronger in States that “swinged” from Democratic to Republican in the 2016 election.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
44 party politics electoral integrity.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
294.35 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
294.35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.